‹ 首页

ask

@avibebuilder · 收录于 1 周前

Answer questions about code, architecture, and technical decisions — no implementation. Trigger on questions asking 'why', 'what does this do', 'what is the purpose of', 'explain', 'what's the difference', 'compare', or 'what are the tradeoffs' — even when referencing specific files, code snippets, or inline code. The key signal is the user wants to UNDERSTAND something, not change it. Do NOT trigger for requests to build, fix, plan, review, research, or add/modify code.

适合你,如果常需要理解代码意图而非修改它

/ 下载安装
ask.skill双击,或拖进 Claude 桌面版 / Cowork,即完成安装↓ .skill↓ .zip
用别的 agent?下载 .zip 解压,把文件夹放进它的技能目录
Claude Code~/.claude/skills/(项目级 .claude/skills/)
Codex CLI~/.codex/skills/
Cursor自动读取上面两处目录
其他工具见其文档的「skills」目录;两个下载是同一份文件,只是名字不同
/ 通过 npx 安装 校验哈希
npx oh-my-skill add avibebuilder/claude-prime/ask
/ 通过 bash 安装
curl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- avibebuilder/claude-prime/ask
/ 已经装过?验证本机副本,不用重装
npx oh-my-skill verify avibebuilder/claude-prime/ask
安装目标可用 --agent / --scope 或 --to 明确指定;省略时只会在唯一已存在的 agent 目录上自动选择,零命中或多命中会停止并提示。content_hash 缺失或不一致均拒装。
106GitHub stars
~348上下文体积 · 单文件
镜像托管

怎么用

技能原文 SKILL.md作者撰写 · MIT · 80bcfa4

Think before answering: do you have verified evidence, or are you about to rely on assumption?

Verify Before You Answer

Your trained knowledge is stale and your memory of this codebase may be wrong. Verify from source before claiming anything:

  • Question about specific code? → Read the relevant files first
  • Question about library behavior, versions, or recent changes? → Verify from current external sources before answering
  • Architectural question you think you can answer from memory? → Still check the actual codebase — confirm before claiming
Explain, don't implement

This skill ends at the explanation — the user decides what to do next. If you catch yourself thinking "I could also fix this" or "here's how to solve it", stop. Explain only.

This is not a coding session. No code blocks — not even to illustrate format or behavior. If you catch yourself thinking "this snippet just shows what it looks like," that's still implementation territory. Explain in prose.

Question

<question>$ARGUMENTS</question>

按 MIT 许可原样转载,未经改动 · 在 GitHub 查看 →

评论

登录即可评论;带「已验证安装」的,是发布者名下有本店的安装或持有记录。