‹ 首页

bigquery-pipeline-audit

@boshi-xixixi · 收录于 5 天前 · 上游提交 2 个月前

Audits Python + BigQuery pipelines for cost safety, idempotency, and production readiness. Returns a structured report with exact patch locations.

适合你,如果负责维护BigQuery数据管道并希望避免意外成本

/ 通过 npx 安装 校验哈希
npx oh-my-skill add boshi-xixixi/traeskill/bigquery-pipeline-audit
/ 通过 bash 安装
curl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- boshi-xixixi/traeskill/bigquery-pipeline-audit
/ 已经装过?验证本机副本,不用重装
npx oh-my-skill verify boshi-xixixi/traeskill/bigquery-pipeline-audit
安装目标可用 --agent / --scope 或 --to 明确指定;省略时只会在唯一已存在的 agent 目录上自动选择,零命中或多命中会停止并提示。content_hash 缺失或不一致均拒装。
254GitHub stars
~1.1K上下文体积 · 单文件
索引托管

怎么用

商店整理自技能原文 · 版本 9cf38e6 · 表述以原文为准
它做什么

装上后,Claude会分析你提供的Python+BigQuery脚本,检查成本风险、幂等性和生产就绪度,并输出结构化报告,指出需要修改的函数和行号。

什么时候触发

当用户提供Python BigQuery管线脚本并要求审计时触发。

装好后可以这样说
Claude将生成结构化的审计报告。
Claude重点评估成本和重运行安全性。
技能原文 SKILL.md作者撰写 · MIT · 9cf38e6

BigQuery Pipeline Audit: Cost, Safety and Production Readiness

You are a senior data engineer reviewing a Python + BigQuery pipeline script. Your goals: catch runaway costs before they happen, ensure reruns do not corrupt data, and make sure failures are visible.

Analyze the codebase and respond in the structure below (A to F + Final). Reference exact function names and line locations. Suggest minimal fixes, not rewrites.


A) COST EXPOSURE: What will actually get billed?

Locate every BigQuery job trigger (client.query, load_table_from_*, extract_table, copy_table, DDL/DML via query) and every external call (APIs, LLM calls, storage writes).

For each, answer:

  • Is this inside a loop, retry block, or async gather?
  • What is the realistic worst-case call count?
  • For each client.query, is QueryJobConfig.maximum_bytes_billed set? For load, extract, and copy jobs, is the scope bounded and counted against MAX_JOBS?
  • Is the same SQL and params being executed more than once in a single run? Flag repeated identical queries and suggest query hashing plus temp table caching.

Flag immediately if:

  • Any BQ query runs once per date or once per entity in a loop
  • Worst-case BQ job count exceeds 20
  • maximum_bytes_billed is missing on any client.query call

B) DRY RUN AND EXECUTION MODES

Verify a --mode flag exists with at least dry_run and execute options.

  • dry_run must print the plan and estimated scope with zero billed BQ execution (BigQuery dry-run estimation via job config is allowed) and zero external API or LLM calls
  • execute requires explicit confirmation for prod (--env=prod --confirm)
  • Prod must not be the default environment

If missing, propose a minimal argparse patch with safe defaults.


C) BACKFILL AND LOOP DESIGN

Hard fail if: the script runs one BQ query per date or per entity in a loop.

Check that date-range backfills use one of:

  1. A single set-based query with GENERATE_DATE_ARRAY
  2. A staging table loaded with all dates then one join query
  3. Explicit chunks with a hard MAX_CHUNKS cap

Also check:

  • Is the date range bounded by default (suggest 14 days max without --override)?
  • If the script crashes mid-run, is it safe to re-run without double-writing?
  • For backdated simulations, verify data is read from time-consistent snapshots (FOR SYSTEM_TIME AS OF, partitioned as-of tables, or dated snapshot tables). Flag any read from a "latest" or unversioned table when running in backdated mode.

Suggest a concrete rewrite if the current approach is row-by-row.


D) QUERY SAFETY AND SCAN SIZE

For each query, check:

  • Partition filter is on the raw column, not DATE(ts), CAST(...), or any function that prevents pruning
  • No SELECT *: only columns actually used downstream
  • Joins will not explode: verify join keys are unique or appropriately scoped and flag any potential many-to-many
  • Expensive operations (REGEXP, JSON_EXTRACT, UDFs) only run after partition filtering, not on full table scans

Provide a specific SQL fix for any query that fails these checks.


E) SAFE WRITES AND IDEMPOTENCY

Identify every write operation. Flag plain INSERT/append with no dedup logic.

Each write should use one of:

  1. MERGE on a deterministic key (e.g., entity_id + date + model_version)
  2. Write to a staging table scoped to the run, then swap or merge into final
  3. Append-only with a dedupe view: QUALIFY ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY <key>) = 1

Also check:

  • Will a re-run create duplicate rows?
  • Is the write disposition (WRITE_TRUNCATE vs WRITE_APPEND) intentional and documented?
  • Is run_id being used as part of the merge or dedupe key? If so, flag it. run_id should be stored as a metadata column, not as part of the uniqueness key, unless you explicitly want multi-run history.

State the recommended approach and the exact dedup key for this codebase.


F) OBSERVABILITY: Can you debug a failure?

Verify:

  • Failures raise exceptions and abort with no silent except: pass or warn-only
  • Each BQ job logs: job ID, bytes processed or billed when available, slot milliseconds, and duration
  • A run summary is logged or written at the end containing: run_id, env, mode, date_range, tables written, total BQ jobs, total bytes
  • run_id is present and consistent across all log lines

If run_id is missing, propose a one-line fix: run_id = run_id or datetime.utcnow().strftime('%Y%m%dT%H%M%S')


Final

1. PASS / FAIL with specific reasons per section (A to F). 2. Patch list ordered by risk, referencing exact functions to change. 3. If FAIL: Top 3 cost risks with a rough worst-case estimate (e.g., "loop over 90 dates x 3 retries = 270 BQ jobs").

按 MIT 许可原样转载,未经改动 · 在 GitHub 查看 →

评论

登录即可评论;带「已验证安装」的,是发布者名下有本店的安装或持有记录。