analyze-content-gaps

@dandye · 收录于 5 天前 · 上游提交 3 个月前

Identify content gaps and organizational opportunities. Analyzes missing content areas, redundancies, and consolidation opportunities.

场景内容审计内容策略网站优化

适合你，如果你需要系统性地发现内容缺失和重复问题。

/ 下载安装

https://github.com/dandye/ai-runbooks/tree/main/skills/analyze-content-gaps ↗

/ 通过 npx 安装 校验哈希

npx oh-my-skill add dandye/ai-runbooks/analyze-content-gaps

/ 通过 bash 安装

curl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- dandye/ai-runbooks/analyze-content-gaps

/ 已经装过?验证本机副本,不用重装

npx oh-my-skill verify dandye/ai-runbooks/analyze-content-gaps

安装目标可用 --agent / --scope 或 --to 明确指定;省略时只会在唯一已存在的 agent 目录上自动选择,零命中或多命中会停止并提示。content_hash 缺失或不一致均拒装。

119GitHub stars

~412上下文体积 · 单文件

索引托管

怎么用

商店整理自技能原文 · 版本 086cbf6 · 表述以原文为准

它做什么

Claude 会分析指定路径下的文档，识别缺失、薄弱、冗余或过时的内容，并与用户需求和竞争标准对比，输出一份包含缺失主题、改进区域和合并目标的战略报告。

什么时候触发

当你要求分析某个文档集合的内容差距，或提出“检查文档缺失项”、“对比竞争对手文档”时触发。

装好后可以这样说

将检查该目录下文档的覆盖情况。

会根据内容重叠识别可合并的页面。

技能原文 SKILL.md作者撰写 · Apache-2.0 · 086cbf6

Analyze Content Gaps Skill

Identify missing, redundant, or underperforming content within a documentation set. This skill compares existing content against user needs and competitive benchmarks to find opportunities for improvement.

Inputs

PATH - The content documentation to analyze (e.g., "/documentation")
USER_NEEDS - (Optional) Boolean, whether to map against user search queries or support tickets (default: true)
COMPETITIVE_ANALYSIS - (Optional) Boolean, whether to compare against industry standards or competitors (default: false)

Workflow

Step 1: Baseline Assessment

Map the current state of content at PATH.

What topics are covered?
What is the depth of coverage?

Step 2: Needs Analysis

Determine what should be covered.

User Needs: Analyze search logs, support tickets, or user stories (if USER_NEEDS is true).
Standards: Compare against standard frameworks or requirements.
Competitors: Compare against competitor documentation (if COMPETITIVE_ANALYSIS is true).

Step 3: Gap Identification

Compare Baseline vs. Needs.

Missing: Topics required but not present.
Thin: Topics present but lacking detail.
Redundant: Multiple pages covering the same topic unnecessarily.
Outdated: Content that no longer matches current needs.

Step 4: Strategic Recommendations

Prioritize gaps based on impact and effort.

Required Outputs

A GAP_ANALYSIS_REPORT in markdown format containing:

Missing Topics: List of high-priority new content to create.
Improvement Areas: List of existing content needing expansion.
Consolidation Targets: List of redundant content to merge.
Strategic Roadmap: Recommended order of execution.

Quick Reference

Purpose: Align content with user needs and business goals.
Outcome: Actionable content strategy roadmap.

按 Apache-2.0 许可原样转载,未经改动 · 在 GitHub 查看 →

登录即可评论;带「已验证安装」的,是发布者名下有本店的安装或持有记录。

…