‹ 首页

hunt-threat

@dandye · 收录于 5 天前 · 上游提交 3 个月前

Conduct proactive, hypothesis-driven threat hunting. Use when performing advanced hunting based on threat intelligence, TTPs, or anomalies. For Tier 3 analysts or dedicated threat hunters. Supports iterative search, pivoting, and comprehensive documentation.

适合你,如果你是安全分析师,需要主动发现隐藏的威胁。

/ 通过 npx 安装 校验哈希
npx oh-my-skill add dandye/ai-runbooks/hunt-threat
/ 通过 bash 安装
curl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- dandye/ai-runbooks/hunt-threat
/ 已经装过?验证本机副本,不用重装
npx oh-my-skill verify dandye/ai-runbooks/hunt-threat
安装目标可用 --agent / --scope 或 --to 明确指定;省略时只会在唯一已存在的 agent 目录上自动选择,零命中或多命中会停止并提示。content_hash 缺失或不一致均拒装。
119GitHub stars
~1K上下文体积 · 单文件
索引托管

怎么用

商店整理自技能原文 · 版本 086cbf6 · 表述以原文为准
它做什么

Claude会按照威胁狩猎流程,从定义假设开始,结合威胁情报进行迭代搜索分析,自动记录发现并生成狩猎报告。

什么时候触发

当用户要求进行高级威胁狩猎,或需要基于威胁情报、TTPs或异常进行主动搜索时触发。

装好后可以这样说
Claude会启动狩猎流程,定义假设并执行查询。
Claude会迭代搜索并分析结果。
Claude会深度分析情报并开发查询。
技能原文 SKILL.md作者撰写 · Apache-2.0 · 086cbf6

Advanced Threat Hunting Skill

Conduct proactive, hypothesis-driven threat hunts based on threat intelligence, observed anomalies, or specific TTPs.

Inputs
  • HUNT_HYPOTHESIS - Clear statement of the hunt objective (required)
  • Example: "Suspected DNS tunneling for C2 based on recent actor TTPs"
  • Example: "Anomalous PowerShell execution on critical servers"
  • Example: "Living-off-the-land techniques bypassing EDR"
  • (Optional) RELEVANT_GTI_REPORTS - GTI Collection IDs or report names
  • (Optional) TARGET_SCOPE_QUERY - UDM query to narrow initial scope
  • TIME_FRAME_HOURS - Lookback period (default: 168 = 7 days)
  • (Optional) HUNT_CASE_ID - case for tracking the hunt
Workflow
Step 1: Define Hypothesis & Scope

Clearly articulate:

  • What threat behavior are we looking for?
  • What would evidence of this look like in logs?
  • What systems/users are in scope?
  • What time period is relevant?

Create or identify HUNT_CASE_ID for documentation.

Step 2: Deep Intelligence Analysis

For each relevant GTI report:

gti-mcp.get_collection_report(id=REPORT_ID)
gti-mcp.get_entities_related_to_a_collection(id=REPORT_ID, relationship_name="attack_techniques")
gti-mcp.get_collection_timeline_events(id=REPORT_ID)
gti-mcp.get_collection_mitre_tree(id=REPORT_ID)

Also:

gti-mcp.get_threat_intel(query="Details on specific TTPs")
Step 3: Develop Initial Hunt Queries

Based on hypothesis and intelligence, formulate advanced queries:

SIEM queries:

secops-mcp.search_security_events(
    text="Advanced UDM query targeting specific behaviors",
    hours_back=TIME_FRAME_HOURS
)

BigQuery (for large-scale analysis):

bigquery.execute-query(query="Complex analytical query")
Step 4: Iterative Search & Analysis

Hunt Loop:

  1. Execute queries
  2. Analyze results for outliers, suspicious patterns
  3. Identify leads (suspicious hosts, users, processes, connections)
  4. Refine hypothesis based on findings
  5. Develop new, more targeted queries
  6. Repeat until exhausted or time limit reached

Key questions at each iteration:

  • Does this match our hypothesis?
  • What's the baseline/normal behavior?
  • Are these true anomalies or noise?
  • What should we pivot on next?
Step 5: Advanced Enrichment

For each promising lead:

secops-mcp.lookup_entity(entity_value=LEAD)

GTI enrichment and pivoting:

gti-mcp.get_..._report(identifier=LEAD)
gti-mcp.get_entities_related_to_...(identifier=LEAD)

Check IOC matches:

secops-mcp.get_ioc_matches()
Step 6: Continuous Documentation

Document throughout in HUNT_CASE_ID:

  • Queries used (with results summary)
  • Analysis reasoning
  • Positive and negative findings
  • Pivots and why they were taken

Use /document-in-case for each significant finding.

Step 7: Hunt Report

Use /generate-report with REPORT_TYPE="hunt_summary":

  • Hypothesis and scope
  • Intelligence sources used
  • Queries executed
  • Findings (positive and negative)
  • Recommendations
Step 8: Action Based on Findings

Confirmed Threat Found: → Escalate to Incident Response immediately → Create incident case, hand over evidence

Suspicious Activity (not confirmed): → Recommend enhanced monitoring → Propose new detection rules to Security Engineering

Valuable Insights (no active threat): → Document for future reference → Propose detection improvements

Inconclusive: → Document process and limitations → Note areas for future investigation

Required Outputs

After completing this skill, you MUST report these outputs:

| Output | Description | |--------|-------------| | HUNT_QUERIES | UDM queries executed during the hunt | | INITIAL_FINDINGS | Raw findings from SIEM searches | | FINDINGS_TYPE | Category: lateral_movement, credential_access, data_exfil, or generic | | DISCOVERED_IOCS | IOCs extracted from findings (IPs, domains, hashes) | | HIGH_CONFIDENCE_IOCS | IOCs confirmed malicious via GTI enrichment | | THREAT_CONFIRMED | Boolean: true if active threat confirmed, false otherwise |

Hunt Hypothesis Templates

TTP-Based:

"Hunt for [MITRE Technique] activity, specifically [observable behavior], targeting [scope] over [timeframe]."

Actor-Based:

"Hunt for [Threat Actor] TTPs including [specific techniques], focusing on [likely targets] based on [intelligence source]."

Anomaly-Based:

"Investigate anomalous [behavior type] observed in [data source], specifically [anomaly description], to determine if malicious."
Example Hunt Queries

DNS Tunneling:

metadata.event_type = "NETWORK_DNS" AND
network.dns.questions.name MATCHES ".*[a-z0-9]{30,}.*" AND
target.hostname NOT IN @known_cdn_domains

Suspicious PowerShell:

metadata.event_type = "PROCESS_LAUNCH" AND
target.process.file.full_path MATCHES ".*powershell.*" AND
target.process.command_line MATCHES ".*(encodedcommand|bypass|hidden).*"

Living-off-the-Land:

metadata.event_type = "PROCESS_LAUNCH" AND
target.process.file.full_path IN @lolbins_list AND
principal.user.userid NOT IN @authorized_admins
按 Apache-2.0 许可原样转载,未经改动 · 在 GitHub 查看 →

评论

登录即可评论;带「已验证安装」的,是发布者名下有本店的安装或持有记录。