dev-ralplan
Multi-perspective consensus planning with Planner/Architect/Critic loop. Use when high-stakes decisions need RALPLAN-DR structured deliberation (auth, migrations, public APIs, irreversible changes). Pairs with @compass-planner + @apex-architect + @raven-critic.
适合你,如果需要在团队中结构化地讨论和决策重大技术变更。
npx oh-my-skill add evolution-foundation/evo-nexus/dev-ralplancurl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- evolution-foundation/evo-nexus/dev-ralplannpx oh-my-skill verify evolution-foundation/evo-nexus/dev-ralplan怎么用
商店整理自技能原文 · 版本 7f5dd76 · 表述以原文为准装上后,Claude会启动一个由规划师、架构师和评论家角色组成的多人共识规划流程,生成带有原则、决策驱动因素、可行选项和架构决策记录的计划。
当需要多视角共识来制定高风险或不可逆的决策(如身份验证、数据迁移、破坏性变更)时触发。你也可以直接说“ralplan”、“consensus”等关键词来激活。
技能原文 SKILL.md
Dev Ralplan
Derived from oh-my-claudecode (MIT, Yeachan Heo). Adapted for the EvoNexus Engineering Layer.
Consensus mode planning: a Planner/Architect/Critic loop that produces a plan with explicit principles, decision drivers, viable options, and an ADR. Used for high-stakes or irreversible work.
Use When
- Multi-perspective consensus needed on a plan or design
- High-stakes work: auth, security, data migrations, destructive/irreversible changes, production incidents, compliance/PII, public API breakage
- User says "ralplan", "consensus", "let's deliberate"
- When
dev-plan --consensuswould normally apply
Do Not Use When
- Simple, low-risk task → use
dev-planstandard mode - User wants direct execution → use
dev-autopilot - Single-perspective is sufficient → use
dev-plandirect mode
Workflow
Stage 1 — Initial plan (@compass-planner)
- Run interview if needed
- Emit RALPLAN-DR summary: Principles (3-5), Decision Drivers (top 3), Viable options (≥2)
- If only 1 viable option remains, document explicit invalidation rationale for alternatives
Stage 2 — Architecture review (@apex-architect)
- Read the plan
- Provide consensus addendum: strongest steelman antithesis, real tradeoff tension, synthesis if viable
- In deliberate mode, flag explicit principle violations
Stage 3 — Critique (@raven-critic)
- Multi-perspective adversarial review
- Pre-commitment predictions
- Gap analysis
- Self-audit + realist check
- Verdict: REJECT / REVISE / ACCEPT-WITH-RESERVATIONS / ACCEPT
Stage 4 — Revised plan (@compass-planner)
- Incorporate apex + raven feedback
- Final plan must include ADR: Decision, Drivers, Alternatives considered, Why chosen, Consequences, Follow-ups
- In deliberate mode: pre-mortem (3 scenarios) + expanded test plan (unit/integration/e2e/observability)
Mode Selection
- Short mode (default): principles + drivers + ADR
- Deliberate mode (
--deliberate): + pre-mortem + expanded test plan + principle violation flags
Trigger deliberate mode when: auth/security touched, data migration, destructive/irreversible change, production incident response, compliance/PII implications, public API breakage.
Output
Final plan saved to workspace/development/plans/[C]ralplan-{name}-{date}.md with ADR section.
Pairs With
@compass-planner(drives the loop)@apex-architect(architecture review)@raven-critic(adversarial review)dev-plan(which can chain into ralplan with--consensus)dev-autopilot(skips its own Phase 0+1 if a ralplan plan already exists)