seo-headings-structure
Audit and propose fixes for a page's heading hierarchy and semantic outline — verify exactly one H1, logical H2-H6 nesting with no skipped levels, descriptive heading text, and HTML5 landmarks (article/section/nav/main/footer) — so the document outline is extractable. Module M7c. Feeds the Search SEO score (clean headings also support AI answer-block extraction, which is scored separately under M11).
适合你,如果你需要优化网页的标题层级和语义结构以提升搜索排名。
用别的 agent?下载 .zip 解压,把文件夹放进它的技能目录
~/.claude/skills/(项目级 .claude/skills/)~/.codex/skills/npx oh-my-skill add hainrixz/claude-seo-ai/seo-headings-structurecurl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- hainrixz/claude-seo-ai/seo-headings-structurenpx oh-my-skill verify hainrixz/claude-seo-ai/seo-headings-structure怎么用
技能原文 SKILL.md
seo-headings-structure (M7c)
A clean, single-rooted heading tree and proper semantic landmarks make a page's outline machine-readable — the same structure that AI engines use to extract answer blocks and that search engines use to understand content scope. Schema/entity context: references/schema-tier1.md.
Audits
Working from the PageSnapshot (rendered_dom if present, else raw_html):
- Single H1: exactly one
<h1>per page. Zero H1s, or multiple H1s, are both findings. - No skipped levels: nesting descends one level at a time (an
<h2>may be followed by<h3>, not directly by<h4>). Build the outline and flag any jump. - Descriptive text: each heading names its section in human terms — flag empty headings, headings used purely for visual styling, and generic placeholders ("Section 1", "Welcome").
- Semantic landmarks: detect
<main>,<article>,<section>,<nav>,<header>,<footer>; flag when headings live inside non-semantic<div>soup or when more than one<main>exists. - Outline ↔ landmark agreement: sectioning elements should carry their own heading; orphan landmarks and headings outside any landmark are findings.
Good heading structure feeds AI answer-block extraction: clear H2/H3 boundaries map to candidate quotable passages.
Fixes
- Heading-level restructuring — re-leveling H2-H6 to remove skips or to nest correctly (fixable: proposed). This alters the visual hierarchy, so it requires per-item accept; emit a
fix_previewdiff, never an auto-write. - Add a single missing H1 — when the page has no H1, propose one sourced from the populated
<title>/og:titleor the obvious page-title element (fixable: proposed, per-item accept — adding a visible heading is editorial). Never fabricate H1 text from thin content; ask the user if the source is ambiguous. - Wrap in semantic landmarks — recommending
<main>/<article>adoption is advisory (structural refactor the tool does not write).
Mark each finding's fixable field consistent with schema/finding.schema.json (auto / proposed / advisory). Never fabricate a heading's text or invent an H1 from thin content — ask the user or leave a clearly-marked TODO placeholder.
Verification
- Method:
dom_assert. Re-parse the snapshot, rebuild the outline, and assert the specific condition (one H1, no level skip, landmark present). - Offline reproduce:
node ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../scripts/parse-html.mjs --url <u>(or--file <path>) — returns theheadingsblock (countsper level,h1_count, andskipped_levels), which counts H1s and walks the H1-H6 tree for skipped levels. - When the rendered DOM tier is required but unavailable (heading injected client-side and only
raw_htmlis present), status isneeds_api, never a falsepass.
Findings
Emit findings per schema/finding.schema.json. Examples:
M7c.h1.multiple— more than one<h1>on the page (statusfail, severity 3,fixable: proposed, axissearch, confidenceestablished).evidence.observedquotes each H1's text and selector;verification.reproduceis theparse-html.mjscommand above (inspecth1_count).M7c.outline.skipped_level— an<h2>followed directly by an<h4>(statusfail, severity 3,fixable: proposed, axissearch, confidencedirectional).evidence.observedquotes the two adjacent headings and their levels.M7c.landmark.no_main— no<main>element; primary content sits in<div>s (statuswarn, severity 3,fixable: advisory, axissearch, confidencedirectional).
Each finding carries evidence.observed quoting the page verbatim and a runnable verification.reproduce; expected_impact is banded + confidence-tagged (no naked percentages).
Honesty
- Heading keyword stuffing does not buy ranking — write headings for the reader; clarity is the signal, not keyword density. Don't recommend cramming terms into H1/H2.
- Multiple H1s are valid HTML5 and modern parsers/AI tolerate them; the real cost is a muddied outline, so treat as severity 3
directional, not a critical failure. Skipped heading levels are primarily an accessibility/structure concern — frame impact honestly (directional) rather than promising a ranking lift.