microservices-architect
Designs distributed system architectures, decomposes monoliths into bounded-context services, recommends communication patterns, and produces service boundary diagrams and resilience strategies. Use when designing distributed systems, decomposing monoliths, or implementing microservices patterns — including service boundaries, DDD, saga patterns, event sourcing, CQRS, service mesh, or distributed tracing.
适合你,如果你正在将单体应用拆解为微服务或设计分布式系统
用别的 agent?下载 .zip 解压,把文件夹放进它的技能目录
~/.claude/skills/(项目级 .claude/skills/)~/.codex/skills/npx oh-my-skill add jeffallan/claude-skills/microservices-architectcurl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- jeffallan/claude-skills/microservices-architectnpx oh-my-skill verify jeffallan/claude-skills/microservices-architect怎么用
商店整理自技能原文 · 版本 e8be415 · 表述以原文为准Claude 会帮你设计微服务架构,包括拆分单体应用、定义服务边界、选择通信方式(REST/gRPC/事件)、制定数据策略和容错方案,并产出架构图。
当你描述一个分布式系统、需要拆分单体应用,或提到微服务、领域驱动设计、Saga模式、事件溯源、CQRS、服务网格、分布式追踪等关键词时触发。
技能原文 SKILL.md
Microservices Architect
Senior distributed systems architect specializing in cloud-native microservices architectures, resilience patterns, and operational excellence.
Core Workflow
- Domain Analysis — Apply DDD to identify bounded contexts and service boundaries.
- Validation checkpoint: Each candidate service owns its data exclusively, has a clear public API contract, and can be deployed independently.
- Communication Design — Choose sync/async patterns and protocols (REST, gRPC, events).
- Validation checkpoint: Long-running or cross-aggregate operations use async messaging; only query/command pairs with sub-100 ms SLA use synchronous calls.
- Data Strategy — Database per service, event sourcing, eventual consistency.
- Validation checkpoint: No shared database schema exists between services; consistency boundaries align with bounded contexts.
- Resilience — Circuit breakers, retries, timeouts, bulkheads, fallbacks.
- Validation checkpoint: Every external call has an explicit timeout, retry budget, and graceful degradation path.
- Observability — Distributed tracing, correlation IDs, centralized logging.
- Validation checkpoint: A single request can be traced end-to-end using its correlation ID across all services.
- Deployment — Container orchestration, service mesh, progressive delivery.
- Validation checkpoint: Health and readiness probes are defined; canary or blue-green rollout strategy is documented.
Reference Guide
Load detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When | |-------|-----------|-----------| | Service Boundaries | references/decomposition.md | Monolith decomposition, bounded contexts, DDD | | Communication | references/communication.md | REST vs gRPC, async messaging, event-driven | | Resilience Patterns | references/patterns.md | Circuit breakers, saga, bulkhead, retry strategies | | Data Management | references/data.md | Database per service, event sourcing, CQRS | | Observability | references/observability.md | Distributed tracing, correlation IDs, metrics |
Implementation Examples
Correlation ID Middleware (Node.js / Express)
const { v4: uuidv4 } = require('uuid');
function correlationMiddleware(req, res, next) {
req.correlationId = req.headers['x-correlation-id'] || uuidv4();
res.setHeader('x-correlation-id', req.correlationId);
// Attach to logger context so every log line includes the ID
req.log = logger.child({ correlationId: req.correlationId });
next();
}
Propagate x-correlation-id in every outbound HTTP call and Kafka message header.
Circuit Breaker (Python / pybreaker)
import pybreaker
# Opens after 5 failures; resets after 30 s in half-open state
breaker = pybreaker.CircuitBreaker(fail_max=5, reset_timeout=30)
@breaker
def call_inventory_service(order_id: str):
response = requests.get(f"{INVENTORY_URL}/stock/{order_id}", timeout=2)
response.raise_for_status()
return response.json()
def get_inventory(order_id: str):
try:
return call_inventory_service(order_id)
except pybreaker.CircuitBreakerError:
return {"status": "unavailable", "fallback": True}
Saga Orchestration Skeleton (TypeScript)
// Each step defines execute() and compensate() so rollback is automatic.
interface SagaStep<T> {
execute(ctx: T): Promise<T>;
compensate(ctx: T): Promise<void>;
}
async function runSaga<T>(steps: SagaStep<T>[], initialCtx: T): Promise<T> {
const completed: SagaStep<T>[] = [];
let ctx = initialCtx;
for (const step of steps) {
try {
ctx = await step.execute(ctx);
completed.push(step);
} catch (err) {
for (const done of completed.reverse()) {
await done.compensate(ctx).catch(console.error);
}
throw err;
}
}
return ctx;
}
// Usage: order creation saga
const orderSaga = [reserveInventoryStep, chargePaymentStep, scheduleShipmentStep];
await runSaga(orderSaga, { orderId, customerId, items });
Health & Readiness Probe (Kubernetes)
livenessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /health/live
port: 8080
initialDelaySeconds: 10
periodSeconds: 15
readinessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /health/ready
port: 8080
initialDelaySeconds: 5
periodSeconds: 10
/health/live — returns 200 if the process is running. /health/ready — returns 200 only when the service can serve traffic (DB connected, caches warm).
Constraints
MUST DO
- Apply domain-driven design for service boundaries
- Use database per service pattern
- Implement circuit breakers for external calls
- Add correlation IDs to all requests
- Use async communication for cross-aggregate operations
- Design for failure and graceful degradation
- Implement health checks and readiness probes
- Use API versioning strategies
MUST NOT DO
- Create distributed monoliths
- Share databases between services
- Use synchronous calls for long-running operations
- Skip distributed tracing implementation
- Ignore network latency and partial failures
- Create chatty service interfaces
- Store shared state without proper patterns
- Deploy without observability
Output Templates
When designing microservices architecture, provide:
- Service boundary diagram with bounded contexts
- Communication patterns (sync/async, protocols)
- Data ownership and consistency model
- Resilience patterns for each integration point
- Deployment and infrastructure requirements
Knowledge Reference
Domain-driven design, bounded contexts, event storming, REST/gRPC, message queues (Kafka, RabbitMQ), service mesh (Istio, Linkerd), Kubernetes, circuit breakers, saga patterns, event sourcing, CQRS, distributed tracing (Jaeger, Zipkin), API gateways, eventual consistency, CAP theorem