‹ 首页

research-architect-intake

@mmthebest · 收录于 1 周前

Collects the target reference papers, desired paper outcome, project state, materials, constraints, and next deliverable for the Research Architect workflow.

适合你,如果需要系统收集研究论文的目标、约束和交付物信息。

/ 下载安装
research-architect-intake.skill双击,或拖进 Claude 桌面版 / Cowork,即完成安装↓ .skill↓ .zip
用别的 agent?下载 .zip 解压,把文件夹放进它的技能目录
Claude Code~/.claude/skills/(项目级 .claude/skills/)
Codex CLI~/.codex/skills/
Cursor自动读取上面两处目录
其他工具见其文档的「skills」目录;两个下载是同一份文件,只是名字不同
/ 通过 npx 安装 校验哈希
npx oh-my-skill add mmthebest/research-architect/research-architect-intake
/ 通过 bash 安装
curl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- mmthebest/research-architect/research-architect-intake
/ 已经装过?验证本机副本,不用重装
npx oh-my-skill verify mmthebest/research-architect/research-architect-intake
安装目标可用 --agent / --scope 或 --to 明确指定;省略时只会在唯一已存在的 agent 目录上自动选择,零命中或多命中会停止并提示。content_hash 缺失或不一致均拒装。
63GitHub stars
~688最小装载
~688含声明引用
~733文本包总量
镜像托管

怎么用

技能原文 SKILL.md作者撰写 · MIT · 4628ef0

Research Architect Intake

Use this branch before reference analysis, brainstorming, study design, evidence organization, or drafting.

Goal

Create a minimal project configuration and source inventory. The user may know the paper they want to emulate while remaining unsure about the research steps. Capture the target paper first, then ask only for missing information that changes the adaptation.

Required questions
  1. Which paper or papers represent the kind of work the user wants to produce?
  2. Which strengths should be learned from them: question framing, theory use, study design, evidence sequence, analysis strategy, evidence displays, argument structure, or writing organization?
  3. What is the user's topic, question, or project direction?
  4. What materials already exist: notes, datasets, documents, code, studies, observations, interviews, figures, tables, quotations, draft fragments, or references?
  5. What immediate output is needed: adapted research options, research plan, first draft, or revision plan?
  6. Which constraints materially affect the design: time, access, participant recruitment, data, archives, equipment, computation, collaborators, ethics, or methods?
  7. Should sources be read from local files, specified paths, or web search?

When the user only says “I want to write a paper like this,” infer likely strengths from the paper and record them as provisional. Avoid turning intake into a long questionnaire.

Target-reference configuration

Record each target paper in target_references:

| Field | Meaning | |---|---| | source_id | Stable source ID | | path_or_identifier | Local path, DOI, URL, or repository location | | role | primary_exemplar, secondary_exemplar, method_reference, or citation_source | | user_target_reason | What the user values, when stated | | desired_similarity | Research functions to learn from | | verification_status | Access and verification state |

Use primary_exemplar only for papers whose overall research logic should guide the adaptation. A paper may have more than one role, but exemplar use and citation support remain separate checks.

Outputs

Create:

paper_output/project_config.json
paper_output/source_map.md
paper_output/source_inventory.md

Use templates/project_config.json as the schema when available.

Source inventory schema

| Source ID | Type | Path/Location | Description | User-Provided? | Reference Role | Evidence Status | Use In Workflow | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Routing decision
  • When at least one target reference exists, route first to the target-reference pass of research-architect-literature.
  • When no target reference exists, route to research-architect-brainstorm, then identify candidate exemplars during literature mapping.
  • When results exist without literature positioning, route to research-architect-literature before drafting.
  • When evidence is absent, mark the workflow as research planning.
Rules
  • Treat user-provided files as relevant inputs with explicit verification states.
  • Separate raw notes, research evidence, literature sources, and target exemplars.
  • Record what the user wants to learn from each target paper.
  • Preserve the difference between transferable research logic and source-specific content.
  • Record human-participant, privacy, access, and data-governance constraints whenever applicable.
按 MIT 许可原样转载,未经改动 · 在 GitHub 查看 →

评论

登录即可评论;带「已验证安装」的,是发布者名下有本店的安装或持有记录。