‹ 首页

30x-seo-content-audit

@norahe0304-art · 收录于 1 周前

Content quality audit for both traditional SEO (E-E-A-T) and AI search (citability, structure, authority). Use when user says "content audit", "content quality", "E-E-A-T", "AI citability", "content analysis", or "is my content good for SEO".

适合你,如果你需要评估内容对搜索引擎和AI搜索的友好度

/ 下载安装
30x-seo-content-audit.skill双击,或拖进 Claude 桌面版 / Cowork,即完成安装↓ .skill↓ .zip
用别的 agent?下载 .zip 解压,把文件夹放进它的技能目录
Claude Code~/.claude/skills/(项目级 .claude/skills/)
Codex CLI~/.codex/skills/
Cursor自动读取上面两处目录
其他工具见其文档的「skills」目录;两个下载是同一份文件,只是名字不同
/ 通过 npx 安装 校验哈希
npx oh-my-skill add norahe0304-art/30x-seo/30x-seo-content-audit
/ 通过 bash 安装
curl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- norahe0304-art/30x-seo/30x-seo-content-audit
/ 已经装过?验证本机副本,不用重装
npx oh-my-skill verify norahe0304-art/30x-seo/30x-seo-content-audit
安装目标可用 --agent / --scope 或 --to 明确指定;省略时只会在唯一已存在的 agent 目录上自动选择,零命中或多命中会停止并提示。content_hash 缺失或不一致均拒装。
41GitHub stars
~1.9K上下文体积 · 单文件
镜像托管

怎么用

技能原文 SKILL.md作者撰写 · MIT · bb60a06

Content Quality Audit

Check both traditional SEO (E-E-A-T) and AI search (citability)
Two Dimensions

| Dimension | Goal | Key Metrics | |-----------|------|-------------| | Traditional SEO | Google rankings | E-E-A-T score, keywords, structure | | AI Citability | ChatGPT/Perplexity citations | Extractability, authority signals, third-party presence |


Part 1: Traditional SEO - E-E-A-T Analysis
E-E-A-T Framework (updated Sept 2025 QRG)

Read seo/references/eeat-framework.md for full criteria.

Experience (first-hand signals)
  • Original research, case studies, before/after results
  • Personal anecdotes, process documentation
  • Unique data, proprietary insights
  • Photos/videos from direct experience
Expertise
  • Author credentials, certifications, bio
  • Professional background relevant to topic
  • Technical depth appropriate for audience
  • Accurate, well-sourced claims
Authoritativeness
  • External citations, backlinks from authoritative sources
  • Brand mentions, industry recognition
  • Published in recognized outlets
  • Cited by other experts
Trustworthiness
  • Contact information, physical address
  • Privacy policy, terms of service
  • Customer testimonials, reviews
  • Date stamps, transparent corrections
  • Secure site (HTTPS)
Content Metrics
Word Count Analysis

Compare against page type minimums: | Page Type | Minimum | |-----------|---------| | Homepage | 500 | | Service page | 800 | | Blog post | 1,500 | | Product page | 300+ (400+ for complex products) | | Location page | 500-600 |

Important: These are topical coverage floors, not targets. Google has confirmed word count is NOT a direct ranking factor. The goal is comprehensive topical coverage — a 500-word page that thoroughly answers the query will outrank a 2,000-word page that doesn't. Use these as guidelines for adequate coverage depth, not rigid requirements.
Readability
  • Flesch Reading Ease: target 60-70 for general audience
Note: Flesch Reading Ease is a useful proxy for content accessibility but is NOT a direct Google ranking factor. John Mueller has confirmed Google does not use basic readability scores for ranking. Yoast deprioritized Flesch scores in v19.3. Use readability analysis as a content quality indicator, not as an SEO metric to optimize directly.
  • Grade level: match target audience
  • Sentence length: average 15-20 words
  • Paragraph length: 2-4 sentences
Keyword Optimization
  • Primary keyword in title, H1, first 100 words
  • Natural density (1-3%)
  • Semantic variations present
  • No keyword stuffing
Content Structure
  • Logical heading hierarchy (H1 → H2 → H3)
  • Scannable sections with descriptive headings
  • Bullet/numbered lists where appropriate
  • Table of contents for long-form content
Multimedia
  • Relevant images with proper alt text
  • Videos where appropriate
  • Infographics for complex data
  • Charts/graphs for statistics
Internal Linking
  • 3-5 relevant internal links per 1000 words
  • Descriptive anchor text
  • Links to related content
  • No orphan pages
External Linking
  • Cite authoritative sources
  • Open in new tab for user experience
  • Reasonable count (not excessive)
AI Content Assessment (Sept 2025 QRG addition)

Google's raters now formally assess whether content appears AI-generated.

Acceptable AI Content
  • Demonstrates genuine E-E-A-T
  • Provides unique value
  • Has human oversight and editing
  • Contains original insights
Low-Quality AI Content Markers
  • Generic phrasing, lack of specificity
  • No original insight
  • Repetitive structure across pages
  • No author attribution
  • Factual inaccuracies
Helpful Content System (March 2024): The Helpful Content System was merged into Google's core ranking algorithm during the March 2024 core update. It no longer operates as a standalone classifier. Helpfulness signals are now weighted within every core update — the same principles apply (people-first content, demonstrating E-E-A-T, satisfying user intent), but enforcement is continuous rather than through separate HCU updates.
AI Citation Readiness (GEO signals)

Optimize for AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews):

  • Clear, quotable statements with statistics/facts
  • Structured data (especially for data points)
  • Strong heading hierarchy (H1→H2→H3 flow)
  • Answer-first formatting for key questions
  • Tables and lists for comparative data
  • Clear attribution and source citations
AI Search Visibility & GEO (2025-2026)

Google AI Mode launched publicly in May 2025 as a separate tab in Google Search, available in 180+ countries. Unlike AI Overviews (which appear above organic results), AI Mode provides a fully conversational search experience with zero organic blue links — making AI citation the only visibility mechanism.

Key optimization strategies for AI citation:

  • Structured answers: Clear question-answer formats, definition patterns, and step-by-step instructions that AI systems can extract and cite
  • First-party data: Original research, statistics, case studies, and unique datasets are highly cited by AI systems
  • Schema markup: Article, FAQ (for non-Google AI platforms), and structured content schemas help AI systems parse and attribute content
  • Topical authority: AI systems preferentially cite sources that demonstrate deep expertise — build content clusters, not isolated pages
  • Entity clarity: Ensure brand, authors, and key concepts are clearly defined with structured data (Organization, Person schema)
  • Multi-platform tracking: Monitor visibility across Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Bing Copilot — not just traditional rankings. Treat AI citation as a standalone KPI alongside organic rankings and traffic.

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO): GEO is the emerging discipline of optimizing content specifically for AI-generated answers. Key GEO signals include: quotability (clear, concise extractable facts), attribution (source citations within your content), structure (well-organized heading hierarchy), and freshness (regularly updated data). Cross-reference the seo-geo skill for detailed GEO workflows.

Content Freshness
  • Publication date visible
  • Last updated date if content has been revised
  • Flag content older than 12 months without update for fast-changing topics
Output
Content Quality Score: XX/100
E-E-A-T Breakdown

| Factor | Score | Key Signals | |--------|-------|-------------| | Experience | XX/25 | ... | | Expertise | XX/25 | ... | | Authoritativeness | XX/25 | ... | | Trustworthiness | XX/25 | ... |

AI Citation Readiness: XX/100
Issues Found
Recommendations

Part 2: AI Citability - Three Pillars
Source: Princeton GEO Research + Industry Best Practices
Pillar 1: Structure (Extractability)

AI systems extract paragraphs, not entire pages. Each key claim should stand alone.

| Content Block Type | Use Case | Example | |-------------------|----------|---------| | Definition block | "What is X?" | "CRM is software that manages customer relationships..." | | Steps block | "How to do X?" | "Step 1... Step 2... Step 3..." | | Comparison table | "X vs Y" | Feature comparison table | | Pros/cons block | Evaluation queries | "Pros:... Cons:..." | | FAQ block | Common questions | Q:... A:... | | Statistics block | Data support | "According to 2025 survey, 73% of users..." |

Structure Rules:

  • Lead each paragraph with the answer (don't bury it)
  • Key paragraphs 40-60 words (optimal AI extraction length)
  • Use question format for H2/H3 headings (match user search)
  • Use tables for comparisons, lists for steps
Pillar 2: Authority (Citability)

| Optimization Method | Visibility Boost | How to Do | |---------------------|:----------------:|-----------| | Cite sources | +40% | Add authoritative citations and links | | Add statistics | +37% | Specific numbers + source | | Expert quotes | +30% | "According to [expert]..." | | Authoritative tone | +25% | Demonstrate expertise | | Keyword stuffing | -10% | Reduces AI visibility |

Best combination: Fluency + Statistics = Maximum boost

Pillar 3: Presence (Third-Party Exposure)

AI doesn't just cite your website, it cites where you appear.

| Platform | AI Citation Share | Action | |----------|:-----------------:|--------| | Wikipedia | 7.8% | Ensure brand page is accurate | | Reddit | 1.8% | Participate in relevant communities | | YouTube | High | Create video content | | Review sites | Medium | Keep G2, Capterra updated | | Quora | Medium | Give in-depth answers to related questions |


Combined Score Output
Content Quality Audit Report

1. Traditional SEO Score: XX/100
   - Experience: XX/25
   - Expertise: XX/25
   - Authoritativeness: XX/25
   - Trustworthiness: XX/25

2. AI Citability Score: XX/100
   - Structure Extractability: XX/33
   - Authority Signals: XX/33
   - Third-Party Presence: XX/33

3. Combined Score: XX/100

4. Priority Fixes
   - [Specific recommendations]

[PROTOCOL]: Update this header on changes, then check CLAUDE.md

按 MIT 许可原样转载,未经改动 · 在 GitHub 查看 →

评论

登录即可评论;带「已验证安装」的,是发布者名下有本店的安装或持有记录。