‹ 首页

audit

@oliver-kriska · 收录于 4 天前 · 上游提交 4 天前

Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors.

适合你,如果需要在发布前或重构后快速掌握项目整体质量

/ 通过 npx 安装 校验哈希
npx oh-my-skill add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/audit
/ 通过 bash 安装
curl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/audit
/ 已经装过?验证本机副本,不用重装
npx oh-my-skill verify oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/audit
安装目标可用 --agent / --scope 或 --to 明确指定;省略时只会在唯一已存在的 agent 目录上自动选择,零命中或多命中会停止并提示。content_hash 缺失或不一致均拒装。
503GitHub stars
~1.6K最小装载
~1.6K含声明引用
~3.7K文本包总量
索引托管

怎么用

商店整理自技能原文 · 版本 88c1194 · 表述以原文为准
它做什么

装上后,Claude 会启动5个专家子代理并行审计项目的架构、性能、安全、测试和依赖,生成包含健康评分、关键问题、建议的报告。

什么时候触发

当你评估项目整体健康、发布前、重构后,或新成员入职时,可使用 /phx:audit 命令触发。

装好后可以这样说
执行默认的完整审计
只做2-3分钟的快速检查
深入分析性能瓶颈
技能原文 SKILL.md作者撰写 · MIT · 88c1194

Project Health Audit

Comprehensive project-wide health assessment using 5 parallel specialist subagents.

Usage
/phx:audit              # Full audit (default)
/phx:audit --quick      # 2-3 minute pulse check
/phx:audit --focus=security   # Deep dive single area
/phx:audit --focus=performance
/phx:audit --since abc123   # Incremental audit since commit
/phx:audit --since HEAD~10  # Audit last 10 commits
When to Use
  • Quarterly health checks
  • Before major releases
  • After large refactors
  • New team member onboarding (understand codebase health)
Iron Laws
  1. Wait for ALL agents before synthesizing — Partial results create misleading health scores because cross-category correlations get missed
  2. Scope agent prompts to specific directories — Vague prompts like "analyze the codebase" produce generic findings that waste tokens and miss real issues
  3. Never compare scores across projects — Scoring methodology depends on project size and maturity; only track trends within the same project
  4. Quick mode before full mode — Run --quick first to catch compile/test failures before spending tokens on 5 parallel agents
Subagent Architecture

Spawn 5 specialists in parallel using Agent tool. Each call routes to a declared-model plugin specialist (sonnet/opus) so the work doesn't fall through to general-purpose (Opus by default):

| Subagent | Focus | Output File | Routes to | |----------|-------|-------------|-----------| | Architecture Reviewer | Structure quality, coupling, cohesion | arch-review.md | phoenix-patterns-analyst (sonnet) | | Performance Auditor | N+1, indexes, bottlenecks, scalability | perf-audit.md | general-purpose (TODO: no perf specialist exists yet) | | Security Auditor | OWASP scan, auth patterns, secrets | security-audit.md | security-analyzer (opus) | | Test Health Auditor | Coverage, quality, flaky tests | test-audit.md | testing-reviewer (sonnet) | | Dependency Auditor | Vulnerabilities, outdated, unused | deps-audit.md | general-purpose (TODO: per-package hex-deps-triager only) |

Workflow
Step 1: Create Task List and Spawn All 5 Auditors (Parallel)

Create Claude Code tasks for real-time progress visibility:

For each auditor:
  TaskCreate({subject: "{Area} audit", activeForm: "Auditing {area}..."})
  TaskUpdate({taskId, status: "in_progress"})

Then spawn all 5 agents with Agent tool (parallel). Route to declared-model specialists where they exist, keep general-purpose only where no specialist covers the audit category:

Agent(subagent_type: "phx:phoenix-patterns-analyst", prompt: "Architecture audit: analyze module structure, context boundaries, coupling, cohesion. Write findings to .claude/audit/reports/arch-review.md", run_in_background: true)
Agent(subagent_type: "general-purpose",          prompt: "Performance audit: N+1 queries, missing indexes, bottlenecks, scalability. Write findings to .claude/audit/reports/perf-audit.md", run_in_background: true)
Agent(subagent_type: "phx:security-analyzer",        prompt: "Security audit: OWASP scan, auth patterns, secret leakage. Write findings to .claude/audit/reports/security-audit.md", run_in_background: true)
Agent(subagent_type: "phx:testing-reviewer",         prompt: "Test health audit: coverage, quality, flakes. Write findings to .claude/audit/reports/test-audit.md", run_in_background: true)
Agent(subagent_type: "general-purpose",          prompt: "Dependency audit: vulnerabilities, outdated, unused. Write findings to .claude/audit/reports/deps-audit.md", run_in_background: true)

Why specialist routing matters: general-purpose subagents inherit the parent session model (usually Opus). Plugin specialists declare their own model in frontmatter (sonnet/haiku for most). Routing 3 of 5 audit tracks to declared-model specialists materially cuts Opus subagent volume per audit run.

Agent prompts must be FOCUSED. Scope each prompt to the relevant directories and patterns. Do NOT give vague prompts like "analyze the codebase."

Output efficiency: Tell each agent: "Report ONLY issues found. Do NOT list clean checks, passing categories, or 'What's Good'. One summary line per clean area suffices."

Step 2: Collect Results

Wait for ALL auditors to complete. Mark each auditor's task as completed via TaskUpdate as it finishes. NEVER proceed while any auditor is still running.

Read reports from .claude/audit/reports/.

Rate-limit circuit breaker: if 2+ auditors return empty results or rate-limit/API errors, STOP spawning. Synthesize from the reports that exist, mark missing categories as "not audited (rate limit)", and tell the user to re-run /phx:audit after the limit resets. Never leave the user typing "continue" against dead agents.

Step 3: Compress Findings

After all 5 auditors complete, spawn context-supervisor:

Agent(subagent_type: "phx:context-supervisor", prompt: """
Compress audit findings.
Input: .claude/audit/reports/
Output: .claude/audit/summaries/
Priority: Health scores per category, critical findings
only, cross-category correlations, deduplicate findings
found by 2+ agents.
""")

Read .claude/audit/summaries/consolidated.md for synthesis.

Step 4: Calculate Health Score

Each category scores 0-100. See ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/scoring-methodology.md.

Step 5: Generate Report

Write to .claude/audit/summaries/project-health-{date}.md.

Output Format

Report includes: Executive summary with health score (A-F, numeric/100), per-category score table (Architecture, Performance, Security, Tests, Dependencies), critical issues, top recommendations, and action plan (Immediate/Short-term/Long-term).

Quick Mode (--quick)

Only run essential checks (~2-3 minutes):

Run mix compile --warnings-as-errors, then mix hex.audit && mix deps.audit, then mix xref graph --format stats, then mix test --trace 2>&1 | tail -20.

Skip: Full security scan, N+1 analysis, test quality metrics, architecture deep dive.

Focus Mode (--focus=area)

Deep dive single area with full specialist resources:

| Focus | Subagent | Extra Checks | |-------|----------|--------------| | security | security-analyzer | Full OWASP, sobelow, manual patterns | | performance | general-purpose | Profile-level analysis, query explain (no plugin specialist yet) | | architecture | phoenix-patterns-analyst | Full xref, coupling matrix, cohesion | | tests | testing-reviewer | Coverage by context, quality metrics | | deps | general-purpose | License audit, maintenance status (per-package hex-deps-triager only) |

Incremental Mode (--since <commit>)

Analyze only changes since a specific commit. Useful for pre-merge checks:

Run git diff --name-only <commit>...HEAD to identify changed files, then run targeted audits on changed files only (skips full project scan).

Combines with other flags: /phx:audit --since HEAD~5 --focus=security

Relationship to Other Commands

| Command | Scope | Frequency | |---------|-------|-----------| | /phx:review | Changed files (diff) | Every PR | | /phx:audit | Entire project | Quarterly | | /phx:boundaries | Context structure | On-demand | | /phx:verify | Compile/test pass | Anytime |

References
  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/scoring-methodology.md - How scores are calculated
  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/architecture-checks.md - Detailed architecture criteria
按 MIT 许可原样转载,未经改动 · 在 GitHub 查看 →

评论

登录即可评论;带「已验证安装」的,是发布者名下有本店的安装或持有记录。