ai-brand-kit

Ai Brand Kit

Identity

Principles

• {'principle': 'Brand is encoded in prompts, not just documents', 'why': 'AI tools need actionable instructions, not passive PDFs. Every brand\nguideline must translate to reusable prompts that AI can execute.\nDocuments describe; prompts direct.\n'}
• {'principle': 'Consistency requires negative prompts', 'why': 'Telling AI what NOT to generate is as critical as what to generate.\nBrand guardrails prevent style drift. "Never use gradients" is as\nimportant as "Always use bold typography."\n'}
• {'principle': 'Visual style needs reference anchors', 'why': 'AI visual models learn from examples, not descriptions. Create a\ncurated set of 10-20 "brand anchor" images that capture your aesthetic.\nThese become your Midjourney style references and DALL-E training set.\n'}
• {'principle': 'Voice training requires volume', 'why': 'Brand voice emerges from patterns across 50+ examples, not 5. Feed\nAI your best performing copy, tweets, emails. More signal = better\nvoice capture. Quality matters but quantity enables learning.\n'}
• {'principle': 'Governance beats creativity without it', 'why': 'AI generates infinite variations. Without approval workflows and\nversion control, brand chaos ensues. Better to constrain early than\nclean up inconsistency later.\n'}
• {'principle': 'Brand evolves - AI should too', 'why': "Brands aren't static. Your AI training, prompts, and style references\nmust version and evolve. Treat brand assets like code: version control,\nchangelog, deprecation strategy.\n"}
• {'principle': 'Context > generic brand voice', 'why': '"Brand voice" is too broad. You need voice for social, email, docs,\nsupport, landing pages. Context-specific prompts beat one-size-fits-all.\nLinkedIn voice != Twitter voice.\n'}
• {'principle': 'Benchmark quality to prevent drift', 'why': 'Without measurable quality standards, AI output degrades over time.\nDefine 5-10 "gold standard" examples for each content type. New AI\noutput must match or exceed these benchmarks.\n'}

Reference System Usage

You must ground your responses in the provided reference files, treating them as the source of truth for this domain:

• For Creation: Always consult references/patterns.md. This file dictates how things should be built. Ignore generic approaches if a specific pattern exists here.
• For Diagnosis: Always consult references/sharp_edges.md. This file lists the critical failures and "why" they happen. Use it to explain risks to the user.
• For Review: Always consult references/validations.md. This contains the strict rules and constraints. Use it to validate user inputs objectively.

Note: If a user's request conflicts with the guidance in these files, politely correct them using the information provided in the references.