‹ 首页

dspy-advanced-module-composition

@omidzamani · 收录于 1 周前

Use for composing DSPy modules with Ensemble, MultiChainComparison, ensemble voting, sequential pipelines, and multi-program workflows.

适合你,如果正在用 DSPy 构建复杂多步骤的 AI 推理管道

/ 下载安装
dspy-advanced-module-composition.skill双击,或拖进 Claude 桌面版 / Cowork,即完成安装↓ .skill↓ .zip
用别的 agent?下载 .zip 解压,把文件夹放进它的技能目录
Claude Code~/.claude/skills/(项目级 .claude/skills/)
Codex CLI~/.codex/skills/
Cursor自动读取上面两处目录
其他工具见其文档的「skills」目录;两个下载是同一份文件,只是名字不同
/ 通过 npx 安装 校验哈希
npx oh-my-skill add omidzamani/dspy-skills/dspy-advanced-module-composition
/ 通过 bash 安装
curl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- omidzamani/dspy-skills/dspy-advanced-module-composition
/ 已经装过?验证本机副本,不用重装
npx oh-my-skill verify omidzamani/dspy-skills/dspy-advanced-module-composition
安装目标可用 --agent / --scope 或 --to 明确指定;省略时只会在唯一已存在的 agent 目录上自动选择,零命中或多命中会停止并提示。content_hash 缺失或不一致均拒装。
113GitHub stars
~1.6K最小装载
~1.6K含声明引用
~1.7K文本包总量
镜像托管

怎么用

技能原文 SKILL.md作者撰写 · MIT · f5db3b7

DSPy Advanced Module Composition

Goal

Compose complex DSPy programs using the Ensemble optimizer, MultiChainComparison for reasoning synthesis, and sequential module patterns.

When to Use
  • Need consensus from multiple approaches
  • Comparing different reasoning strategies
  • Building robust pipelines with fallbacks
  • Complex multi-step workflows with branching
  • Ensemble methods for improved accuracy
Related Skills
  • Design modules: [dspy-custom-module-design](../dspy-custom-module-design/SKILL.md)
  • Define signatures: [dspy-signature-designer](../dspy-signature-designer/SKILL.md)
  • Evaluate performance: [dspy-evaluation-suite](../dspy-evaluation-suite/SKILL.md)
Inputs

| Input | Type | Description | |-------|------|-------------| | modules | list[dspy.Module] | Modules to compose | | composition_type | str | "ensemble", "sequential", "comparison" |

Outputs

| Output | Type | Description | |--------|------|-------------| | composed_program | dspy.Module | Composed multi-module program |

Workflow
Phase 1: Ensemble Voting

Combine multiple programs using the Ensemble optimizer:

import dspy
from dspy.teleprompt import Ensemble

dspy.configure(lm=dspy.LM("openai/gpt-4o-mini"))

# Define a signature for the task
class BasicQA(dspy.Signature):
    """Answer questions with short factoid answers."""
    question = dspy.InputField()
    answer = dspy.OutputField()

# Create multiple program instances (should be optimized/compiled programs)
# For simple demonstration, we'll use different predictors
program1 = dspy.Predict(BasicQA)
program2 = dspy.ChainOfThought(BasicQA)
program3 = dspy.Predict(BasicQA)

# Ensemble is an optimizer that compiles programs together
ensemble = Ensemble(reduce_fn=dspy.majority)
ensembled_program = ensemble.compile([program1, program2, program3])

# Use the ensembled program
result = ensembled_program(question="What is 2 + 2?")
print(result.answer)  # Voted answer
Phase 2: MultiChainComparison

Compare multiple reasoning attempts:

import dspy

class BasicQA(dspy.Signature):
    """Answer questions with short factoid answers."""
    question = dspy.InputField()
    answer = dspy.OutputField(desc="often between 1 and 5 words")

class ComparisonPipeline(dspy.Module):
    def __init__(self):
        # Generate multiple reasoning attempts
        self.cot = dspy.ChainOfThought(BasicQA)

        # Compare M attempts and select best
        # Must pass a Signature class, not a string
        self.compare = dspy.MultiChainComparison(
            BasicQA,
            M=3,  # Number of attempts to compare
            temperature=0.7
        )

    def forward(self, question):
        # Generate multiple completions to compare
        # Each completion must have rationale/reasoning field
        completions = [
            self.cot(question=question)
            for _ in range(3)
        ]

        # MultiChainComparison synthesizes them into best answer
        # Pass completions as positional arg, not keyword arg
        return self.compare(completions, question=question)

# Usage
dspy.configure(lm=dspy.LM("openai/gpt-4o-mini"))
pipeline = ComparisonPipeline()
result = pipeline(question="Explain quantum computing")
print(f"Best answer: {result.answer}")
print(f"Rationale: {result.rationale}")
Phase 3: Sequential Composition

Chain modules for multi-step workflows:

import dspy

# Define signatures for each step
class QueryRewrite(dspy.Signature):
    """Rewrite a question for better retrieval."""
    question = dspy.InputField()
    refined_query: str = dspy.OutputField()

class GenerateAnswer(dspy.Signature):
    """Generate answer from context and question."""
    context = dspy.InputField()
    question = dspy.InputField()
    answer = dspy.OutputField()

class ValidateAnswer(dspy.Signature):
    """Validate answer quality."""
    answer = dspy.InputField()
    question = dspy.InputField()
    is_valid: bool = dspy.OutputField()
    confidence: float = dspy.OutputField()

class SequentialRAG(dspy.Module):
    """Multi-step RAG pipeline."""

    def __init__(self):
        # Step 1: Query rewriting
        self.rewrite = dspy.Predict(QueryRewrite)

        # Step 2: Retrieval
        self.retrieve = dspy.Retrieve(k=5)

        # Step 3: Answer generation
        self.generate = dspy.ChainOfThought(GenerateAnswer)

        # Step 4: Validation
        self.validate = dspy.Predict(ValidateAnswer)

    def forward(self, question):
        # Sequential execution
        refined = self.rewrite(question=question)
        passages = self.retrieve(refined.refined_query).passages

        answer_pred = self.generate(
            context=passages,
            question=question
        )

        validation = self.validate(
            answer=answer_pred.answer,
            question=question
        )

        return dspy.Prediction(
            answer=answer_pred.answer,
            is_valid=validation.is_valid,
            confidence=validation.confidence
        )

# Usage
dspy.configure(lm=dspy.LM("openai/gpt-4o-mini"))
rag = SequentialRAG()
result = rag(question="What causes lightning?")
print(f"Answer: {result.answer} (valid: {result.is_valid})")
Phase 4: Fallback Strategies

Handle failures with fallback modules:

import dspy
import logging

logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)

class BasicQA(dspy.Signature):
    """Answer questions with short factoid answers."""
    question = dspy.InputField()
    answer = dspy.OutputField()

class RobustQA(dspy.Module):
    """Fallback strategy for errors."""

    def __init__(self):
        self.primary = dspy.ChainOfThought(BasicQA)
        self.fallback = dspy.Predict(BasicQA)

    def forward(self, question):
        try:
            result = self.primary(question=question)
            if result.answer and len(result.answer) > 10:
                return result
        except Exception as e:
            logger.error(f"Primary failed: {e}")

        return self.fallback(question=question)
Production Example
import dspy
from dspy.teleprompt import BootstrapFewShot, Ensemble

class GenerateAnswer(dspy.Signature):
    """Generate answer from context and question."""
    context = dspy.InputField()
    question = dspy.InputField()
    answer = dspy.OutputField()

class MultiStrategyQA(dspy.Module):
    """Production QA with retrieval."""

    def __init__(self):
        self.retrieve = dspy.Retrieve(k=3)
        self.generate = dspy.ChainOfThought(GenerateAnswer)

    def forward(self, question: str):
        context = self.retrieve(question).passages
        return self.generate(context=context, question=question)

# Usage with optimization
dspy.configure(lm=dspy.LM("openai/gpt-4o-mini"))
qa = MultiStrategyQA()

# First, optimize the base program
optimizer = BootstrapFewShot(
    metric=lambda ex, pred, trace: ex.answer in pred.answer,
    max_bootstrapped_demos=3
)

compiled_qa = optimizer.compile(qa, trainset=trainset)

# Then create ensemble from multiple optimized programs
# (train with different seeds or optimizers to get diversity)
program1 = optimizer.compile(qa, trainset=trainset)
program2 = optimizer.compile(qa, trainset=trainset)
program3 = optimizer.compile(qa, trainset=trainset)

ensemble = Ensemble(reduce_fn=dspy.majority)
final_program = ensemble.compile([program1, program2, program3])
Best Practices
  1. Test modules independently - Validate each module before composition
  2. Handle failures gracefully - Use try/except in parallel composition
  3. Balance cost vs accuracy - Ensembles are expensive (N × cost)
  4. Optimize composed programs - Use BootstrapFewShot or MIPROv2 on final composition
  5. Module reusability - Design modules to work in multiple compositions
Limitations
  • Ensemble increases cost linearly with module count
  • Voting strategies may not work for all output types
  • Sequential composition amplifies latency
  • Error propagation in chains can be hard to debug
  • Parallel composition requires careful state management
Official Documentation
  • DSPy Documentation: https://dspy.ai/
  • DSPy GitHub: https://github.com/stanfordnlp/dspy
  • Modules Guide: https://dspy.ai/learn/programming/modules/
按 MIT 许可原样转载,未经改动 · 在 GitHub 查看 →

评论

登录即可评论;带「已验证安装」的,是发布者名下有本店的安装或持有记录。