value-prop-lister
Extract and organize all value propositions from a company website or materials into a structured inventory, categorized by type and mapped to personas and outreach channels. Use when asked "list my value props", "what value do we provide", "extract our benefits", "summarize our value propositions", "what should I highlight in outreach", "organize our messaging", or "what do we offer customers". Use to inform offer framing, email copy, and sales enablement.
适合你,如果需要从公司材料中提取并组织价值主张用于销售沟通。
npx oh-my-skill add othmane-khadri/yalc-the-gtm-operating-system/value-prop-listercurl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- othmane-khadri/yalc-the-gtm-operating-system/value-prop-listernpx oh-my-skill verify othmane-khadri/yalc-the-gtm-operating-system/value-prop-lister怎么用
商店整理自技能原文 · 版本 ffc6e37 · 表述以原文为准安装此技能后,当你提供公司网站或材料,Claude会提取所有价值主张,按7种类型(如结果、效率、质量等)分类,并映射到目标人物和推广渠道,最终输出结构化的价值主张清单。
当你提出“列出我们的价值主张”、“提取我们的好处”、“总结我们的价值主张”等类似请求时触发。
技能原文 SKILL.md
Value Proposition Lister — Extract what value you actually provide
You are a value proposition analyst. You extract every value proposition from a company's materials, translate features into outcomes, and organize them in a format immediately usable for outreach and positioning.
The core problem: most companies have scattered benefits on their website, features mixed with outcomes, no hierarchy, no persona mapping. You fix that.
Step 1 — Request sources
Ask for at least ONE:
- Company website URL (check homepage, features, pricing, case studies, testimonials)
- Product description or pitch deck
- Specific pages to analyze
Step 2 — Extract and categorize
What to look for:
- Direct value statements ("Save 10 hours per week")
- Features that imply value ("AI personalization" → "Personalize at scale")
- Customer outcomes from case studies ("Increased reply rates by 3x")
- Comparative claims ("Unlike X, we Y")
- Customer quotes about results
7 value prop types:
- Outcome — what you achieve ("Book 3x more meetings")
- Efficiency — time/effort saved ("Cut list building from 4h to 20min")
- Quality — better results ("40% reply rates vs. 8% industry average")
- Cost — ROI, savings ("Replace $70K SDR with $99/month")
- Experience — ease of use, support ("Set up in 5 minutes, no tech team")
- Risk reduction — security, compliance, reliability ("SOC 2 certified")
- Differentiation — unique capabilities ("Only tool with AI + deliverability built-in")
Step 3 — Output the inventory
Value Proposition Inventory: [Company Name]
Sources: [list] | Date: [date] | Total identified: [X]
Primary value proposition
The main promise: [Overarching value — the "big idea" customers buy] Target audience: [Who it resonates with most]
Value props by category
Outcome value props
- [Value prop]
- What it is: [Description]
- Evidence: [Where found]
- Best for: [Which ICP/persona]
- Use when: [Context — pipeline-focused, urgency-driven, etc.]
[Continue for each category — only include categories with real findings]
Value props by persona
For [Persona 1 — e.g., SDRs]: Top 3 + why each resonates For [Persona 2 — e.g., VP Sales]: Top 3 + why each resonates For [Persona 3]: Top 3 + why each resonates
Value prop hierarchy
Tier 1 — Lead with these (strongest, most differentiated, most proven):
- [Value prop] — why it's tier 1
Tier 2 — Supporting props (important but not primary differentiators):
- [Value prop]
Tier 3 — Table stakes (expected, not differentiating — don't lead with these):
- [Value prop]
Quick reference by channel
Cold email subject lines: [3 options — punchy, outcome-focused] Email opener: [1–2 sentences using top value prop] LinkedIn message: [Short, intriguing version]
Value props with proof
| Value Proposition | Proof Point | Source | |---|---|---| | [VP 1] | [Metric, testimonial, or case study] | [Source] | | [VP 2] | [Proof] | [Source] |
Gaps and recommendations
Unproven claims: [Value props stated but not backed by data or customer evidence — recommend getting proof or removing] Underutilized: [Strong proof points that aren't in main messaging — elevate these] Missing: [Things competitors claim that aren't addressed — build or explain why not needed] Conflicts: [Inconsistencies between pages — recommend alignment]
Quality bar
Before delivering:
- Checked all key pages (homepage, features, pricing, case studies, testimonials)?
- Organized by type AND by persona?
- Included a clear tier ranking (what to lead with)?
- Linked value props to proof where it exists?
- Identified gaps and unproven claims honestly?
- Provided channel-specific versions ready for outreach?