escalation-design
When and how AI should escalate to humans, refuse, or ask for clarification.
适合你,如果你在构建AI系统时需要定义何时求助人类。
/ 通过 npx 安装 校验哈希
npx oh-my-skill add owl-listener/ai-design-skills/escalation-design/ 通过 bash 安装
curl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- owl-listener/ai-design-skills/escalation-design/ 已经装过?验证本机副本,不用重装
npx oh-my-skill verify owl-listener/ai-design-skills/escalation-design安装目标可用 --agent / --scope 或 --to 明确指定;省略时只会在唯一已存在的 agent 目录上自动选择,零命中或多命中会停止并提示。content_hash 缺失或不一致均拒装。
144GitHub stars
~553上下文体积 · 单文件
索引托管
怎么用
商店整理自技能原文 · 版本 f41b650 · 表述以原文为准它做什么
本技能指导AI在遇到不确定、高风险、用户情绪波动等情况时,主动将问题升级给人工客服或建议用户自行决策,而不是死循环或擅自处理。
什么时候触发
当AI对回答信心低、任务涉及重大后果(如财务、医疗)、用户表现出情绪困扰、请求超出范围或违反策略,以及无法澄清歧义时触发。
装好后可以这样说
AI识别到信心不足时,会主动请求人工介入。
高风险场景下,AI拒绝并指引正确渠道。
检测到用户情绪 distress 时,提供升级选项。
技能原文 SKILL.md
Escalation Design
Escalation is what happens when the AI reaches the boundary of what it should handle alone. Designing escalation well means the user gets help instead of a dead end — and the AI knows its limits.
Escalation Triggers
The AI should escalate when:
- Confidence is low: The AI isn't sure its output is correct or helpful
- Stakes are high: The decision has significant consequences (financial, medical, legal, safety)
- Emotional distress: The user shows signs of crisis, distress, or vulnerability
- Ambiguity is unresolvable: The AI can't determine intent even after clarification
- Scope boundary: The request is outside what the AI is designed to handle
- Policy boundary: The request approaches or crosses a guardrail
- Conflict: The user disagrees with the AI and the disagreement can't be resolved
Escalation Types
- To human support: Transfer to a human agent with full context
- To the user themselves: "This decision is yours to make" — handing back agency
- To a specialist: Routing to domain-specific help (medical, legal, technical)
- To a supervisor/admin: Flagging for organisational review
- Self-escalation: The AI flags its own output for review before delivering it
Designing the Escalation Experience
The user's experience of escalation matters:
- Context transfer: When escalating to a human, pass the full conversation. Don't make the user repeat themselves.
- Warm handoff: "I'm connecting you with someone who can help with this" — not a cold redirect.
- Expectation setting: Tell the user what will happen next and how long it might take.
- Graceful degradation: If no human is available, offer alternatives — not a dead end.
- Dignity: Never make the user feel stupid for needing escalation.
Escalation Anti-Patterns
- The infinite loop: AI keeps trying instead of escalating, frustrating the user
- Premature escalation: AI escalates when it could easily handle the request, annoying the user
- Context loss: User has to start over after escalation
- Blame shifting: AI implies the user caused the problem
- Hidden escalation: Escalation happens without the user knowing
Design Artefacts
- Escalation trigger matrix: Trigger | Threshold | Escalation Type | User Experience
- Escalation flow diagrams per feature
- Context handoff specifications
- Fallback path designs for when escalation isn't available
- Escalation quality metrics
按 MIT 许可原样转载,未经改动 · 在 GitHub 查看 →
评论
登录即可评论;带「已验证安装」的,是发布者名下有本店的安装或持有记录。
…