‹ 首页

handoff-protocols

@owl-listener · 收录于 5 天前 · 上游提交 1 个月前

Designing smooth transitions between agents and between AI and humans.

适合你,如果正在构建多智能体系统或需要设计人机交接流程

/ 通过 npx 安装 校验哈希
npx oh-my-skill add owl-listener/ai-design-skills/handoff-protocols
/ 通过 bash 安装
curl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- owl-listener/ai-design-skills/handoff-protocols
/ 已经装过?验证本机副本,不用重装
npx oh-my-skill verify owl-listener/ai-design-skills/handoff-protocols
安装目标可用 --agent / --scope 或 --to 明确指定;省略时只会在唯一已存在的 agent 目录上自动选择,零命中或多命中会停止并提示。content_hash 缺失或不一致均拒装。
144GitHub stars
~606上下文体积 · 单文件
索引托管

怎么用

商店整理自技能原文 · 版本 f41b650 · 表述以原文为准
它做什么

Claude能协助你设计AI助手之间或AI与人类之间的任务交接方案,包括定义触发条件、传递信息、确认机制和用户体验,以降低上下文丢失风险。

什么时候触发

当你需要规划多AI系统任务流转、从AI转人工,或分析现有交接流程时触发。

装好后可以这样说
Claude会给出包括负载和确认的详细步骤。
Claude提供全量、摘要、结构化等选项。
Claude会分析黑盒、回音室等常见问题。
技能原文 SKILL.md作者撰写 · MIT · f41b650

Handoff Protocols

A handoff is the moment one agent passes work to another — or to a human. It's where multi-agent systems most commonly fail. A dropped handoff means lost context, repeated work, or abandoned tasks.

Anatomy of a Handoff

Every handoff has:

  • Trigger: What causes the handoff? (task completion, scope boundary, failure, user request)
  • Source: Who is handing off?
  • Destination: Who is receiving?
  • Payload: What information transfers? (context, partial results, user state, instructions)
  • Acknowledgment: How does the source know the destination received the handoff?
  • User experience: What does the user see during the handoff?
Handoff Types
  • Sequential: Agent A finishes, passes results to Agent B who continues. Like a relay race.
  • Parallel fan-out: One agent distributes subtasks to multiple agents simultaneously.
  • Parallel fan-in: Multiple agents' results converge back to one agent for synthesis.
  • Escalation: An agent can't handle the task and passes up to a more capable agent or human.
  • Fallback: The primary agent fails and a backup takes over.
  • Human handoff: AI passes work to a human for review, decision, or completion.
Context Transfer

The most common handoff failure is context loss. Design what transfers:

  • Full context: Everything the source agent knew. Safe but potentially overwhelming.
  • Summarised context: Key information distilled. Efficient but risks losing important nuance.
  • Structured context: Predefined fields that must be populated. Consistent but rigid.
  • Incremental context: Only what's new since the last handoff. Efficient for ongoing collaborations.
Designing for the User

The user's experience of handoffs matters:

  • Invisible handoff: The user doesn't know agents changed. The experience feels seamless.
  • Transparent handoff: The user is told a new agent is taking over and why.
  • Participatory handoff: The user confirms the handoff or provides additional context.
  • User-initiated handoff: The user explicitly requests a different agent or a human.
Handoff Anti-Patterns
  • The black hole: Work is handed off but never picked up
  • The echo chamber: Agents hand work back and forth without progress
  • The context cliff: Critical information is lost in the handoff
  • The jarring transition: The user's experience changes dramatically at the handoff point
  • The silent redirect: The user doesn't know they've been handed off and gets confused by changes
Design Artefacts
  • Handoff protocol specifications (trigger, source, destination, payload, acknowledgment)
  • Context transfer templates
  • Handoff sequence diagrams
  • User experience specifications for each handoff type
  • Handoff failure mode analysis
按 MIT 许可原样转载,未经改动 · 在 GitHub 查看 →

评论

登录即可评论;带「已验证安装」的,是发布者名下有本店的安装或持有记录。