‹ 首页

handoff

@remvisual · 收录于 1 周前

Create a structured session handoff when context is running low or work is pausing. Deep context mining, self-validation, multi-file splitting. Captures everything the next session needs.

适合你,如果经常需要中断工作并在下次快速恢复进度

/ 下载安装
handoff.skill双击,或拖进 Claude 桌面版 / Cowork,即完成安装↓ .skill↓ .zip
用别的 agent?下载 .zip 解压,把文件夹放进它的技能目录
Claude Code~/.claude/skills/(项目级 .claude/skills/)
Codex CLI~/.codex/skills/
Cursor自动读取上面两处目录
其他工具见其文档的「skills」目录;两个下载是同一份文件,只是名字不同
/ 通过 npx 安装 校验哈希
npx oh-my-skill add remvisual/claude-handoff/handoff
/ 通过 bash 安装
curl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- remvisual/claude-handoff/handoff
/ 已经装过?验证本机副本,不用重装
npx oh-my-skill verify remvisual/claude-handoff/handoff
安装目标可用 --agent / --scope 或 --to 明确指定;省略时只会在唯一已存在的 agent 目录上自动选择,零命中或多命中会停止并提示。content_hash 缺失或不一致均拒装。
29GitHub stars
~2.3K最小装载
~5.1K含声明引用
~5.1K文本包总量
镜像托管

怎么用

技能原文 SKILL.md作者撰写 · MIT · c407845

Session Handoff

Guards:

  • Not plan mode. This skill writes files. If in Claude Code plan mode, exit first.
  • Not shadowing. NEVER generate handoff-like documents freeform. Freeform summaries look right but lack chain tracking, self-validation, and evidence mining. Only this skill produces handoffs.
  • Not when discussing. Only run when the user explicitly asks to CREATE a handoff right now. If ambiguous ("what does handoff do", "edit the handoff file"), ask first.

Typical use: ~75% context. You have a lot of conversation to mine — extract maximum value before closing. On 1M context that's ~750K tokens of history.

The user should not need to provide anything — /handoff alone is sufficient.

Arguments: $ARGUMENTS


Agent Strategy

Parallelize independent research. Launch in one message.

| What | Mode | Why | |---|---|---| | Step 1A (git/beads/ls) | Parallel Bash, never agents | Cheap commands; agent bootup wastes 15K+ each | | Step 1B context agents (OV, stale-refs, bible) | Parallel Bash inline; agents only if parent handoff >500 lines | Independent research | | Step 1C (conversation mining) | Main agent only | Only you have the history | | Steps 5+6 (beads/memory writes) | Parallel Bash | Independent writes |


Step 1: Deep Context Gathering
1A: External State (parallel Bash — never agents)

Run in one message as inline Bash calls:

| Commands | Returns | |---|---| | git log --oneline -20, git diff --stat, git status -s \| head -30, git branch --show-current | Branch, recent commits, uncommitted changes | | bd list --status=in_progress, bd list --status=open --priority=0,1, bd stats (skip if bd unavailable) | Active/open beads | | ls plans/handoffs/, ls .claude/handoffs/, ls plans/*.md | Existing handoff files |

1B: Chain Detection

Resolve the chain tag (use first that applies):

  1. Epic exists → use epic name/ID
  2. 1-4 beads → use all bead IDs (e.g., myproject-xxxx, myproject-yyyy)
  3. 5+ beads → pick 2-3 most relevant to the primary work stream
  4. No beads/epic → generate fallback: python -c "import secrets; print(secrets.token_hex(4))"standalone-{hex}

Find prior handoff in this chain (two tiers, stop at first match):

  • Tier A — Paste Prompt (deterministic). Did the user start this session by pasting something like Read HANDOFF_foo_date.md (seq 2, chain-x) and continue...? If yes, that file is the parent. Read its header. Continuation — seq = parent's + 1.
  • Tier B — Bead/Epic Scan (heuristic, skips auto-handoffs). ```bash grep -l "Chain:.*{chain_tag}" plans/handoffs/HANDOFF_*.md 2>/dev/null \ | xargs grep -L "^\*\*Auto:\*\* true" 2>/dev/null ```

A shared bead is a CANDIDATE, not proof of continuation. Before claiming the match as parent:

  1. Read the candidate's ## Where We're Going section.
  2. Is current session work a direct follow-on of those steps? (Same feature/fix, continuing the named next-actions?)
  3. Clear continuation → inherit chain, increment seq, set parent.
  4. Unclear or unrelated → treat this as seq 1 (new chain). Add a ## Related Handoffs section listing the sibling file as reference only, NOT parent. A bead can host many independent work streams (brainstorm → impl → testing) — don't conflate them.
  5. Any doubt → ask the user: "Found prior handoff {file} on same bead. Is this session a continuation? (default: new chain)"

Neither tier matches: seq 1, parent: none.

1B-3/4: Context Agents (parallel, inline Bash unless parent is huge)

Once chain tag resolved, launch in parallel:

| Task | Returns | |---|---| | OV Recall (if available): /memory-recall with 2-3 keyword searches | Prior decisions, failed approaches | | Parent Context (if parent exists): READ FULL PARENT — extract Goal, Where We Are, Key Decisions, What We Tried, Where We're Going, Open Questions, code identifiers | Parent summary for "Since Last Handoff" + identifier list | | Reference Docs: ls plans/*BIBLE* plans/*bible* *BIBLE* CLAUDE.md .claude/CLAUDE.md and read if found | Project context | | Stale Refs (if parent): Grep each parent identifier against current codebase | List of identifiers NOT found |

Parent reading is MANDATORY when a parent exists. "Since Last Handoff" requires comparing what was planned vs what happened. Skip agents that don't apply.

1C: Conversation Mining

If arguments were provided ($ARGUMENTS), use as a soft hint for framing. Conversation is ground truth.

Choose mining pass and announce it (this is not optional):

| Pass | When | Strategy | |---|---|---| | Quick | <100K context tokens | Single pass with extraction checklist below | | Deep | 100K-500K context tokens, OR 1M context + 20+ tool calls | Two passes — read references/mining-deep-chunked.md | | Chunked | 500K+ context tokens, OR 1M context + 50+ tool calls or >1hr work | Map-reduce — read references/mining-deep-chunked.md |

Write: "Mining with {Quick/Deep/Chunked} pass ({reason})." before starting. Don't use numeric names — they collide with chain seq numbers.

For Deep or Chunked, read references/mining-deep-chunked.md NOW for the multi-pass protocol. Don't do map-reduce from memory.

Extraction checklist (apply per pass):

  • [ ] Goals & objectives (user's target, overarching epic)
  • [ ] Work completed (every file modified, function changed, with specifics)
  • [ ] Approaches tried (chronological, successful and failed)
  • [ ] Failed approaches + why (MOST expensive to re-discover)
  • [ ] Test results & measurements (raw numbers)
  • [ ] Data files created (paths to JSON/CSV/logs)
  • [ ] Decisions made + rejected alternatives
  • [ ] Discoveries & gotchas
  • [ ] Code analysis (signatures, thresholds, constants)
  • [ ] User preferences expressed
  • [ ] Remaining questions
  • [ ] Dependencies on other work

If you're skimming, STOP. Re-read. Details are the value.


Step 2: Choose Output Location

First directory that exists (or create plans/handoffs/):

  1. plans/handoffs/
  2. .claude/handoffs/
Step 3: Generate File Name
  • With beads: HANDOFF_{chain_tag}_{slug}_{YYYY-MM-DD}.md (e.g., HANDOFF_myproject-xxxx_auth-rewrite_2026-03-19.md). For multi-bead, use primary bead only.
  • No beads: HANDOFF_{slug}_{YYYY-MM-DD}.md
  • Slug: 2-4 word kebab-case.
  • Collision: append _2, _3, etc.
Step 4: Write the Handoff File

Read references/output-template.md for the full file structure. It defines every section (Goal, Where We Are, What We Tried, Evidence & Data, etc.) with composition rules.

Line Budget

Check your system prompt for context window size.

| | Standard (200K) | Extended (1M) | |---|---|---| | Target (aim for ceiling) | 300-400 lines | 500-800 lines | | Hard minimum | 150 lines | 250 lines | | Light session min | 80 lines | 120 lines | | Split threshold | 400 lines | 800 lines |

Target the CEILING. An 800-line handoff on 1M context is ~0.7% of the window — negligible cost, huge savings. Too-long is cheap; too-short costs hours of re-investigation.

Two-Phase Write
  1. Phase 1 — Initial Write. Compose and write everything in ONE Write call. All sections. Phase 1 MUST hit the pass minimum on its own — Quick: 150+ standard / 250+ extended, Deep: 300+, Chunked: 500+. Phase 1 is not a rough draft; it's the baseline. If you find yourself planning to "flesh it out in Phase 2," stop and expand the current sections before writing.
  2. Phase 2 — Gap Research. After writing, count lines. Read your file back. Scan conversation for data you didn't capture (tables skipped, mid-session feedback missed, measurements without numbers, approaches mentioned but not detailed). Use Edit to append toward the ceiling. Phase 2 is for gaps, not for baseline. If Phase 2 needs to add 50+ lines to reach the minimum, Phase 1 was under-mined.

Phase 2 is MANDATORY for Deep and Chunked passes. Optional for Quick — but run it if your first pass is below the ceiling by >20%.

Splitting: only if final file exceeds threshold. Under threshold = one file.


Step 4-CHECK: Self-Validation

Read references/validation.md and run every check. If any fails, expand thin sections before proceeding.


Steps 5 + 6: Update Beads & Persist Memory (parallel Bash)
# Beads (if in_progress work exists)
bd update {id} --notes "Handoff written. See {file_path}"

# Memory (if bd remember available)
bd remember "Handoff: {path}. Chain: {chain_tag} seq {N}. Status: {status}. Next: {next action}"
Step 7: Report

Tell the user concisely:

  • File path(s) and line count(s)
  • Chain info (tag, seq, new vs continuation)
  • Self-check outcome (and what was expanded if first pass failed)
  • The Next Action
Step 8: Ask to Close Session

Ask:

Handoff complete. Ready to close this session? - Yes — I'll commit, mark "session closed", give you a paste prompt for the next session. - No — We keep working. Say "close session" when done. (Defaults to commit — say "close without commit" to skip.)

Based on the answer, read references/close-session.md and follow the flow for Yes / No / "close without commit".


Cleanup: Archiving Completed Chains

When bead/epic is closed and all work is done:

# Find all handoffs for a bead or epic
grep -l 'Chain:.*{bead_id_or_epic}' plans/handoffs/HANDOFF_*.md plans/handoffs/PLAN_*.md 2>/dev/null

# Archive (don't delete — old decisions are useful)
mkdir -p plans/handoffs/archive/
mv {files} plans/handoffs/archive/
按 MIT 许可原样转载,未经改动 · 在 GitHub 查看 →

评论

登录即可评论;带「已验证安装」的,是发布者名下有本店的安装或持有记录。