‹ 首页

writing-orchestration

@robertguss · 收录于 1 周前

This skill should be used when orchestrating complex writing workflows with multiple phases. It provides two-agent orchestration patterns, the two-gate content readiness assessment, 10 baseline writing strategies, 20+ situational strategies, and quality checkpoints. Inspired by the Spiral Writing System.

适合你,如果需要系统化地规划、撰写和优化复杂内容

/ 下载安装
writing-orchestration.skill双击,或拖进 Claude 桌面版 / Cowork,即完成安装↓ .skill↓ .zip
用别的 agent?下载 .zip 解压,把文件夹放进它的技能目录
Claude Code~/.claude/skills/(项目级 .claude/skills/)
Codex CLI~/.codex/skills/
Cursor自动读取上面两处目录
其他工具见其文档的「skills」目录;两个下载是同一份文件,只是名字不同
/ 通过 npx 安装 校验哈希
npx oh-my-skill add robertguss/claude-code-toolkit/writing-orchestration
/ 通过 bash 安装
curl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- robertguss/claude-code-toolkit/writing-orchestration
/ 已经装过?验证本机副本,不用重装
npx oh-my-skill verify robertguss/claude-code-toolkit/writing-orchestration
安装目标可用 --agent / --scope 或 --to 明确指定;省略时只会在唯一已存在的 agent 目录上自动选择,零命中或多命中会停止并提示。content_hash 缺失或不一致均拒装。
103GitHub stars
~1.4K最小装载
~4.9K含声明引用
~4.9K文本包总量
镜像托管

怎么用

技能原文 SKILL.md作者撰写 · MIT · c31f3be

Writing Orchestration Skill

A complete orchestration system for complex writing workflows. This skill provides the strategic layer that coordinates agents, applies writing strategies, and ensures content quality.

When to Use This Skill

This skill applies when:

  • Coordinating multiple writing agents
  • Applying strategic writing decisions
  • Assessing content readiness before drafting
  • Selecting and applying writing strategies
  • Running quality checkpoints on drafts
Two-Agent Architecture

Complex writing benefits from separation of concerns:

Orchestrator Role
  • Classifies requests (information vs. content)
  • Applies two-gate assessment
  • Gathers research and context
  • Hands off to writer when ready
  • Never creates content directly
Writer Role
  • Creates drafts using strategies
  • Applies style guides
  • Produces variations (EXPLORATION mode)
  • Refines based on feedback (REFINEMENT mode)
  • Uses tools for all content (never in chat)
User Request
    ↓
[Orchestrator] → Classify → Research → Two-Gate Assessment
    ↓
    ├── Not Ready → Gather more material/clarity
    ↓
    └── Ready → Handoff to Writer
                    ↓
              [Writer] → Apply Strategies → Create Drafts
                    ↓
              Quality Checkpoints → Output
Two-Gate Content Readiness Assessment

Before any content creation, apply this assessment:

Gate 1: Material Sufficiency

Question: "Could the writer create this without inventing facts?"

| Outcome | Action | |---------|--------| | ✓ Pass | Have concrete examples, data, quotes available | | ✗ Fail | Need to research/gather material first |

Pass signals:

  • Specific examples available
  • Data points confirmed
  • Expert quotes accessible
  • No major claims need fabrication
Gate 2: Message Clarity

Question: "Do we know EXACTLY what message to convey?"

| Outcome | Action | |---------|--------| | ✓ Pass | Clear, specific communication goal | | ✗ Fail | Need to interview for clarity |

Pass signals:

  • Can state thesis in one sentence
  • Know the audience specifically
  • Know the desired action
  • Angle is differentiated
Decision Matrix

| Material | Message | Action | |----------|---------|--------| | ✓ | ✓ | Handoff to writer immediately | | ✓ | ✗ | Interview for message clarity | | ✗ | ✓ | Research/gather material | | ✗ | ✗ | Interview for both |

10 Baseline Strategies (ALWAYS Apply)

These strategies apply to ALL content. Reference [baseline-strategies.md](./references/baseline-strategies.md) for full details.

| Strategy | Rule | Transform | |----------|------|-----------| | reader-zero-context | Add 3-6 word orienting phrases | "Stripe handles billing" → "Stripe, the payments platform, handles billing" | | subject-verb | Subject + verb in first 5 words | "There were students who..." → "Students completed..." | | activate-verbs | Precise verbs over is/was | "Markets were down" → "Markets plunged" | | watch-adverbs | Let strong verbs carry load | "whispered quietly" → "whispered" | | limit-ings | Simple tense over continuous | "are running tests" → "run tests" | | prefer-simple | Everyday language unless technical | "utilizes stochastic gradient" → "learns by trial and error" | | cut-big-small | Edit hierarchically | Paragraphs → Sentences → Words | | ban-empty-hypophora | No self-answered questions | "The payoff? Our app..." → "Our app..." | | present-active-tense | Direct, immediate language | "debuts today" → "is out now" | | one-idea-per-sentence | Single clear point | Split compound thoughts |

20+ Situational Strategies (Select 3-4)

Choose based on content type and goals. Reference [situational-strategies.md](./references/situational-strategies.md) for full list.

Hook & Opening
  • hook-effectiveness - Counterintuitive or surprising openings
  • tension-builder - Create and resolve tension
  • pattern-twist - Set expectations, then break them
Structure & Flow
  • order-words-emphasis - Important words at sentence ends
  • sentence-length - Vary for rhythm (short for impact, long for flow)
  • paragraph-length - Mix for visual rhythm
  • ladder-abstraction - Alternate concrete ↔ abstract
Style & Voice
  • elegant-variation - Avoid word repetition
  • passive-aggressive - Strategic passive for emphasis
  • punctuation-pace - Use punctuation for rhythm
  • key-words-space - Give important terms breathing room
Persuasion & Engagement
  • essential-name-filter - Only names that add value
  • name-of-dog - Specific details for authenticity
  • original-images - Fresh metaphors, avoid clichés
  • show-and-tell - Balance showing with telling
Narrative & Story
  • narrate-scenes - Immersive scene-setting
  • cinematic-angles - Camera-like perspective shifts
  • dialogue-compression - Tight, purposeful dialogue
  • reveal-traits - Character through action
Quality Checkpoints

Before finalizing content, verify:

Opening Quality
  • [ ] Opening is counterintuitive or surprising
  • [ ] Leads with most compelling insight/moment/problem
  • [ ] No chronology/setup/version numbers in opening
  • [ ] Hook earns the next sentence
Body Quality
  • [ ] Body delivers on opening's promise
  • [ ] Concrete sensory details present
  • [ ] Each paragraph has clear purpose
  • [ ] Transitions are smooth
Strategy Compliance
  • [ ] All 10 baseline strategies applied
  • [ ] 3-4 situational strategies visible
  • [ ] Each sentence expresses one clear idea
  • [ ] Technical terminology oriented with context
Style Guide Compliance
  • [ ] Voice matches profile/guide
  • [ ] No prohibited words/patterns
  • [ ] Formatting rules followed
Content Modes
EXPLORATION Mode (New Content)

When creating new content:

  1. Generate 3 different drafts
  2. Vary angle, not just words
  3. Apply all strategies to each
  4. Let user choose direction
REFINEMENT Mode (Editing)

When user provides feedback:

  1. Work with existing draft
  2. Preserve voice and structure
  3. Apply specific changes requested
  4. Keep what works
Handoff Protocol
Orchestrator → Writer
[Research summary if applicable - 2-3 sentences]
[Material gathered: list key assets]
[Message clarity: thesis statement]
[Style guide: name if applicable]
[Mode: EXPLORATION or REFINEMENT]
Writer → Orchestrator (Rare)

Only when:

  • User explicitly requests brainstorming
  • New research topic needed
  • Web search required
  • Significant scope change
Integration with Commands
/writing:plan

Uses Orchestrator patterns:

  • Request classification
  • Research phase
  • Two-gate assessment
  • Material gathering
/writing:draft

Uses Writer patterns:

  • Strategy application
  • Mode selection
  • Draft creation
  • Quality checkpoints
/writing:review

Uses both:

  • Orchestrator: coordinate review agents
  • Writer: apply fixes
/writing:compound

Captures patterns that worked for future orchestration.

References
  • [baseline-strategies.md](./references/baseline-strategies.md) - Full 10 baseline strategies with examples
  • [situational-strategies.md](./references/situational-strategies.md) - 20+ situational strategies
  • [quality-checkpoints.md](./references/quality-checkpoints.md) - Detailed checkpoint criteria
按 MIT 许可原样转载,未经改动 · 在 GitHub 查看 →

评论

登录即可评论;带「已验证安装」的,是发布者名下有本店的安装或持有记录。