document-review
This skill should be used to refine brainstorm or plan documents before proceeding to the next workflow step. It applies when a brainstorm or plan document exists and the user wants to improve it.
适合你，如果你有草稿需要打磨后再进入下一步
npx oh-my-skill add sammyjoyce/pi-compound-engineering/document-reviewcurl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- sammyjoyce/pi-compound-engineering/document-reviewnpx oh-my-skill verify sammyjoyce/pi-compound-engineering/document-review怎么用
技能原文 SKILL.md
Document Review
Improve brainstorm or plan documents through structured review.
Step 1: Get the Document
If a document path is provided: Read it, then proceed to Step 2.
If no document is specified: Ask which document to review, or look for the most recent brainstorm/plan in docs/brainstorms/ or docs/plans/.
Step 2: Assess
Read through the document and ask:
- What is unclear?
- What is unnecessary?
- What decision is being avoided?
- What assumptions are unstated?
- Where could scope accidentally expand?
These questions surface issues. Don't fix yet—just note what you find.
Step 3: Evaluate
Score the document against these criteria:
| Criterion | What to Check | |-----------|---------------| | Clarity | Problem statement is clear, no vague language ("probably," "consider," "try to") | | Completeness | Required sections present, constraints stated, open questions flagged | | Specificity | Concrete enough for next step (brainstorm → can plan, plan → can implement) | | YAGNI | No hypothetical features, simplest approach chosen |
If invoked within a workflow (after /workflows:brainstorm or /workflows:plan), also check:
- User intent fidelity — Document reflects what was discussed, assumptions validated
Step 4: Identify the Critical Improvement
Among everything found in Steps 2-3, does one issue stand out? If something would significantly improve the document's quality, this is the "must address" item. Highlight it prominently.
Step 5: Make Changes
Present your findings, then:
- Auto-fix minor issues (vague language, formatting) without asking
- Ask approval before substantive changes (restructuring, removing sections, changing meaning)
- Update the document inline—no separate files, no metadata sections
Simplification Guidance
Simplification is purposeful removal of unnecessary complexity, not shortening for its own sake.
Simplify when:
- Content serves hypothetical future needs, not current ones
- Sections repeat information already covered elsewhere
- Detail exceeds what's needed to take the next step
- Abstractions or structure add overhead without clarity
Don't simplify:
- Constraints or edge cases that affect implementation
- Rationale that explains why alternatives were rejected
- Open questions that need resolution
Step 6: Offer Next Action
After changes are complete, ask:
- Refine again - Another review pass
- Review complete - Document is ready
Iteration Guidance
After 2 refinement passes, recommend completion—diminishing returns are likely. But if the user wants to continue, allow it.
Return control to the caller (workflow or user) after selection.
What NOT to Do
- Do not rewrite the entire document
- Do not add new sections or requirements the user didn't discuss
- Do not over-engineer or add complexity
- Do not create separate review files or add metadata sections