‹ 首页

seo-ai-search-share-of-voice

@seranking · 收录于 1 周前

Measure AI Search share of voice for a target domain versus competitors across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overview, and AI Mode. Pulls the AIO leaderboard, then samples prompts where each domain appears as a source or brand mention, and analyses topic clusters each brand owns. Use when the user asks for AI Search share of voice, LLM visibility tracking, AEO/GEO analysis, AI Overview competitive analysis, or wants to know which brands LLMs cite in their category.

适合你,如果想知道ChatGPT等AI搜索中你的品牌被提及多少

/ 下载安装
seo-ai-search-share-of-voice.skill双击,或拖进 Claude 桌面版 / Cowork,即完成安装↓ .skill↓ .zip
用别的 agent?下载 .zip 解压,把文件夹放进它的技能目录
Claude Code~/.claude/skills/(项目级 .claude/skills/)
Codex CLI~/.codex/skills/
Cursor自动读取上面两处目录
其他工具见其文档的「skills」目录;两个下载是同一份文件,只是名字不同
/ 通过 npx 安装 校验哈希
npx oh-my-skill add seranking/seo-skills/seo-ai-search-share-of-voice
/ 通过 bash 安装
curl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- seranking/seo-skills/seo-ai-search-share-of-voice
/ 已经装过?验证本机副本,不用重装
npx oh-my-skill verify seranking/seo-skills/seo-ai-search-share-of-voice
安装目标可用 --agent / --scope 或 --to 明确指定;省略时只会在唯一已存在的 agent 目录上自动选择,零命中或多命中会停止并提示。content_hash 缺失或不一致均拒装。
85GitHub stars
~957上下文体积 · 单文件
镜像托管

怎么用

技能原文 SKILL.md作者撰写 · MIT · fd6d140
Example output: [examples/seo-ai-search-share-of-voice-wix-com-20260427/REPORT.md](../../examples/seo-ai-search-share-of-voice-wix-com-20260427/REPORT.md)

AI Search Share of Voice

Compare AI-search visibility for a target brand against competitors across every major LLM engine, then analyse the topic clusters each brand owns and where gaps exist.

Prerequisites
  • SE Ranking MCP server connected.
  • User provides: (a) target domain and its brand name, (b) list of competitor domains and brand names, (c) country (default: us), and (d) optionally, which engines to analyse (default: all supported: ai-overview, chatgpt, perplexity, gemini, ai-mode).
Process
  1. Leaderboard snapshot DATA_getAiOverviewLeaderboard
  2. Pull the AIO leaderboard for the target domain's category in the target country.
  3. Capture mention counts and share percentages per engine, per domain.
  1. Heatmap table
  2. Build a table: rows = domains (target + competitors), columns = engines, cells = % share of voice.
  3. Highlight the leader per engine and the worst performer.
  1. Prompt sampling per domain DATA_getAiPromptsByBrand, DATA_getAiPromptsByTarget
  2. For each domain (target and each competitor):
  3. Pull 10 ChatGPT prompts where the domain appears as a source (link mention).
  4. Pull 10 ChatGPT prompts where the brand is mentioned by name.
  5. Save query text and the exact sources cited so the user can validate.
  1. Topic clustering
  2. Group prompts by theme (e.g., pricing, feature comparison, tutorials, alternatives, reviews).
  3. For each brand, note which clusters it dominates and which it is absent from.
  1. Gap and recommendation synthesis
  2. Identify 3 to 5 topic clusters where the target underperforms competitors despite having relevant content.
  3. Recommend specific actions: new content angles, structured data additions, partnerships with frequently-cited sources, comparison pages, FAQ/How-To schema.
Output format

Create a folder seo-ai-search-share-of-voice-{target-slug}-{YYYYMMDD}/ with:

seo-ai-search-share-of-voice-{target-slug}-{YYYYMMDD}/
├── 01-leaderboard.md         # raw leaderboard per engine
├── 02-heatmap.md             # visual heatmap table
├── 03-prompts-{domain}.md    # one file per domain with 20 sampled prompts
├── 04-topic-clusters.md      # cluster membership per brand
└── REPORT.md                 # executive summary

REPORT.md follows this shape:

# AI Search Share of Voice: {target brand} vs competitors

## Summary
- Target: {target} ({share}% across all engines)
- Leader: {leader brand} ({share}%)
- Target rank: {n} of {total}

## Heatmap

| Domain | AI Overview | ChatGPT | Perplexity | Gemini | AI Mode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {target} | {%} | {%} | {%} | {%} | {%} |
| {comp1} | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

## Who owns what

### {target brand}
Strong in: {cluster 1}, {cluster 2}
Absent from: {cluster 3}, {cluster 4}

### {competitor 1 brand}
...

## Topic cluster ownership

| Cluster | Leader | Share | Target position | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | {brand} | {%} | {n} | {% behind} |
| Alternatives | {brand} | {%} | {n} | {% behind} |
| Tutorials | {brand} | {%} | {n} | {% behind} |

## Top 5 actions to close gaps
1. {action with target cluster}
2. ...
Tips
  • Do not hallucinate citation counts. If the API returns zero prompts for a given domain/engine, report zero, do not estimate.
  • For each competitor, validate the brand-name match in the prompt text. Sometimes "Wix" appears in a sentence about "wiktionary" or a person's name. Flag ambiguous matches in the raw-prompt file.
  • base_domain scope is the default; do not narrow to subdomain unless the user asks.
  • Respect Data API rate limit: 10 requests per second. With 5 domains and 2 prompt queries per engine per domain, pace the loop.
  • The report is not a one-time artefact. Recommend the user re-run monthly and diff results to see ranking momentum.
按 MIT 许可原样转载,未经改动 · 在 GitHub 查看 →

评论

登录即可评论;带「已验证安装」的,是发布者名下有本店的安装或持有记录。