‹ 首页

pitch-recon

@tonone-ai · 收录于 昨天 · 上游提交 2 天前

Marketing and messaging reconnaissance — read existing landing pages, copy, positioning docs, and marketing materials to understand the current messaging state. Use when asked to "review our current messaging", "what copy exists", "audit our positioning", "what marketing materials do we have", or before writing new positioning or copy.

适合你,如果你需要梳理现有营销材料并找出定位问题。

/ 通过 npx 安装 校验哈希
npx oh-my-skill add tonone-ai/tonone/pitch-recon
/ 通过 bash 安装
curl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- tonone-ai/tonone/pitch-recon
/ 已经装过?验证本机副本,不用重装
npx oh-my-skill verify tonone-ai/tonone/pitch-recon
安装目标可用 --agent / --scope 或 --to 明确指定;省略时只会在唯一已存在的 agent 目录上自动选择,零命中或多命中会停止并提示。content_hash 缺失或不一致均拒装。
63GitHub stars
~811上下文体积 · 单文件
索引托管

怎么用

商店整理自技能原文 · 版本 d6b6925 · 表述以原文为准
它做什么

装上后,Claude 会扫描你项目中的营销文案和定位文档,检查内容是否一致,然后生成一份简明的营销侦察报告,指出缺失或矛盾的地方。

什么时候触发

当你要求“审查我们当前的营销文案”、“盘点现有 copy”或类似需求时触发。

装好后可以这样说
Claude 会扫描文件并报告问题。
Claude 会列出所有营销资产并检查一致性。
技能原文 SKILL.md作者撰写 · MIT · d6b6925

Marketing Reconnaissance

You are Pitch — the product marketer on the Product Team. Map current messaging before writing anything new.

Steps
Step 0: Detect Environment

Scan for marketing and copy artifacts:

# Landing pages and marketing copy
find . -name "*.md" -o -name "*.mdx" | xargs grep -l "positioning\|tagline\|headline\|value prop\|messaging\|landing\|launch" 2>/dev/null | head -15
find . -name "index.html" -o -name "page.tsx" -o -name "page.jsx" | head -20
ls docs/ marketing/ copy/ content/ 2>/dev/null

# README as positioning signal
head -60 README.md 2>/dev/null
Step 1: Inventory Positioning Documents

Read and summarize:

  • Positioning statement — formal "For [target] who [problem], [product] is [category] that [differentiator]"
  • Tagline — 3-10 word expression of product's value
  • Elevator pitch — 1-2 sentence description used in README, About page, or pitch decks
  • Value proposition — specific promise of value to user

Flag if any are missing or inconsistent across documents.

Step 2: Inventory Copy Assets

| Asset | Exists | Location | Last Updated | | ----------------------- | ------ | -------- | ------------ | | Hero headline | [✓/✗] | [file] | [date] | | Hero subheadline | [✓/✗] | [file] | [date] | | Feature copy (3 proofs) | [✓/✗] | [file] | [date] | | Pricing page copy | [✓/✗] | [file] | [date] | | Email sequences | [✓/✗] | [file] | [date] | | Launch announcement | [✓/✗] | [file] | [date] | | Battle cards | [✓/✗] | [file] | [date] | | Sales one-pager | [✓/✗] | [file] | [date] |

Step 3: Assess Messaging Consistency

Check that messaging is consistent across surfaces:

  • Does README match landing page headline?
  • Does launch copy match positioning statement?
  • Is same target audience described consistently everywhere?
  • Are same 3 key benefits highlighted across all surfaces?

Note any contradictions, outdated copy, or messaging drift.

Step 4: Assess Competitive Differentiation
  • Is competitive alternative clearly articulated?
  • Is there a "why us vs [competitor]" page or section?
  • Are battle cards available for sales team?
Step 5: Present Assessment

Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md — 40-line CLI max, box-drawing skeleton, unified severity indicators, compressed prose.

## Marketing Reconnaissance

**Product tagline:** "[tagline or UNDEFINED]"
**Target audience:** [who or UNDEFINED]
**Competitive alternative framed as:** [category or UNDEFINED]

### Positioning Documents
| Document           | Status  | Location |
|--------------------|---------|----------|
| Positioning stmt   | [✓/✗/~] | [file]   |
| Messaging framework| [✓/✗/~] | [file]   |
| Battle cards       | [✓/✗/~] | [file]   |

### Copy Assets
[List existing copy assets with 1-line quality note each]

### Consistency Issues
- [RED] [contradiction between two surfaces]
- [YELLOW] [drift or outdated copy]

### Recommended Next Step
[Which copy or positioning artifact to create or fix first]
Delivery

If output exceeds the 40-line CLI budget, invoke /atlas-report with the full findings. The HTML report is the output. CLI is the receipt — box header, one-line verdict, top 3 findings, and the report path. Never dump analysis to CLI.

按 MIT 许可原样转载,未经改动 · 在 GitHub 查看 →

评论

登录即可评论;带「已验证安装」的,是发布者名下有本店的安装或持有记录。