‹ 首页

reality-verification

@tzachbon · 收录于 1 周前

This skill should be used when the user asks to "verify a fix", "reproduce failure", "diagnose issue", "check BEFORE/AFTER state", "VF task", "reality check", "check test quality", "mock-only tests", or needs guidance on verifying fixes by reproducing failures before and after implementation, or detecting mock-heavy test anti-patterns.

适合你,如果需要在修复前后复现故障并确认问题已解决。

/ 下载安装
reality-verification.skill双击,或拖进 Claude 桌面版 / Cowork,即完成安装↓ .skill↓ .zip
用别的 agent?下载 .zip 解压,把文件夹放进它的技能目录
Claude Code~/.claude/skills/(项目级 .claude/skills/)
Codex CLI~/.codex/skills/
Cursor自动读取上面两处目录
其他工具见其文档的「skills」目录;两个下载是同一份文件,只是名字不同
/ 通过 npx 安装 校验哈希
npx oh-my-skill add tzachbon/smart-ralph/reality-verification
/ 通过 bash 安装
curl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- tzachbon/smart-ralph/reality-verification
/ 已经装过?验证本机副本,不用重装
npx oh-my-skill verify tzachbon/smart-ralph/reality-verification
安装目标可用 --agent / --scope 或 --to 明确指定;省略时只会在唯一已存在的 agent 目录上自动选择,零命中或多命中会停止并提示。content_hash 缺失或不一致均拒装。
419GitHub stars
~749最小装载
~2K含声明引用
~2K文本包总量
镜像托管

怎么用

技能原文 SKILL.md作者撰写 · MIT · 1b33202

Reality Verification

For fix goals: reproduce the failure BEFORE work, verify resolution AFTER.

Goal Detection

Classify user goals to determine if diagnosis is needed. See references/goal-detection-patterns.md for detailed patterns.

Quick reference:

  • Fix indicators: fix, repair, resolve, debug, patch, broken, failing, error, bug
  • Add indicators: add, create, build, implement, new
  • Conflict resolution: If both present, treat as Fix
Command Mapping

| Goal Keywords | Reproduction Command | |---------------|---------------------| | CI, pipeline | gh run view --log-failed | | test, tests | project test command | | type, typescript | pnpm check-types or tsc --noEmit | | lint | pnpm lint | | build | pnpm build | | E2E, UI | Playwright MCP browser tools | | API, endpoint | WebFetch tool |

For E2E/deployment verification, use MCP tools (Playwright MCP browser tools for UI, WebFetch tool for APIs).

BEFORE/AFTER Documentation
BEFORE State (Diagnosis)

Document in .progress.md under ## Reality Check (BEFORE):

## Reality Check (BEFORE)

**Goal type**: Fix
**Reproduction command**: `pnpm test`
**Failure observed**: Yes
**Output**:

FAIL src/auth.test.ts Expected: 200 Received: 401

**Timestamp**: 2026-01-16T10:30:00Z
AFTER State (Verification)

Document in .progress.md under ## Reality Check (AFTER):

## Reality Check (AFTER)

**Command**: `pnpm test`
**Result**: PASS
**Output**:

PASS src/auth.test.ts All tests passed

**Comparison**: BEFORE failed with 401, AFTER passes
**Verified**: Issue resolved
VF Task Format

Add as task 4.3 (after PR creation) for fix-type specs:

- [ ] 4.3 VF: Verify original issue resolved
  - **Do**:
    1. Read BEFORE state from .progress.md
    2. Re-run reproduction command: `<command>`
    3. Compare output with BEFORE state
    4. Document AFTER state in .progress.md
  - **Verify**: `grep -q "Verified: Issue resolved" ./specs/<name>/.progress.md`
  - **Done when**: AFTER shows issue resolved, documented in .progress.md
  - **Commit**: `chore(<name>): verify fix resolves original issue`
Test Quality Checks

When verifying test-related fixes, check for mock-only test anti-patterns. See references/mock-quality-checks.md for detailed patterns.

Quick reference red flags:

  • Mock declarations > 3x real assertions
  • Missing import of actual module under test
  • All assertions are mock interaction checks (toHaveBeenCalled)
  • No integration tests
  • Missing mock cleanup (afterEach)
Why This Matters

| Without | With | |---------|------| | "Fix CI" spec completes but CI still red | CI verified green before merge | | Tests "fixed" but original failure unknown | Before/after comparison proves fix | | Silent regressions | Explicit failure reproduction | | Manual verification required | Automated verification in workflow | | Tests pass but only test mocks | Tests verify real behavior, not mock behavior | | False sense of security from green tests | Confidence that tests catch real bugs |

按 MIT 许可原样转载,未经改动 · 在 GitHub 查看 →

评论

登录即可评论;带「已验证安装」的,是发布者名下有本店的安装或持有记录。