context-engineering
Master context engineering for AI agent systems. Use when designing agent architectures, debugging context failures, optimizing token usage, implementing memory systems, building multi-agent coordination, evaluating agent performance, or developing LLM-powered pipelines. Covers context fundamentals, degradation patterns, optimization techniques (compaction, masking, caching), compression strategies, memory architectures, multi-agent patterns, LLM-as-Judge evaluation, tool design, and project development.
适合你,如果你正在构建或调试AI Agent系统,需要管理上下文和记忆。
npx oh-my-skill add vodailocz/kilo-kit-mcp/context-engineeringcurl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- vodailocz/kilo-kit-mcp/context-engineeringnpx oh-my-skill verify vodailocz/kilo-kit-mcp/context-engineering怎么用
技能原文 SKILL.md
Context Engineering
Context engineering curates the smallest high-signal token set for LLM tasks. The goal: maximize reasoning quality while minimizing token usage.
When to Activate
- Designing/debugging agent systems
- Context limits constrain performance
- Optimizing cost/latency
- Building multi-agent coordination
- Implementing memory systems
- Evaluating agent performance
- Developing LLM-powered pipelines
Core Principles
- Context quality > quantity - High-signal tokens beat exhaustive content
- Attention is finite - U-shaped curve favors beginning/end positions
- Progressive disclosure - Load information just-in-time
- Isolation prevents degradation - Partition work across sub-agents
- Measure before optimizing - Know your baseline
Quick Reference
| Topic | When to Use | Reference | |-------|-------------|-----------| | Fundamentals | Understanding context anatomy, attention mechanics | [context-fundamentals.md](./references/context-fundamentals.md) | | Degradation | Debugging failures, lost-in-middle, poisoning | [context-degradation.md](./references/context-degradation.md) | | Optimization | Compaction, masking, caching, partitioning | [context-optimization.md](./references/context-optimization.md) | | Compression | Long sessions, summarization strategies | [context-compression.md](./references/context-compression.md) | | Memory | Cross-session persistence, knowledge graphs | [memory-systems.md](./references/memory-systems.md) | | Multi-Agent | Coordination patterns, context isolation | [multi-agent-patterns.md](./references/multi-agent-patterns.md) | | Evaluation | Testing agents, LLM-as-Judge, metrics | [evaluation.md](./references/evaluation.md) | | Tool Design | Tool consolidation, description engineering | [tool-design.md](./references/tool-design.md) | | Pipelines | Project development, batch processing | [project-development.md](./references/project-development.md) |
Key Metrics
- Token utilization: Warning at 70%, trigger optimization at 80%
- Token variance: Explains 80% of agent performance variance
- Multi-agent cost: ~15x single agent baseline
- Compaction target: 50-70% reduction, <5% quality loss
- Cache hit target: 70%+ for stable workloads
Four-Bucket Strategy
- Write: Save context externally (scratchpads, files)
- Select: Pull only relevant context (retrieval, filtering)
- Compress: Reduce tokens while preserving info (summarization)
- Isolate: Split across sub-agents (partitioning)
Anti-Patterns
- Exhaustive context over curated context
- Critical info in middle positions
- No compaction triggers before limits
- Single agent for parallelizable tasks
- Tools without clear descriptions
Guidelines
- Place critical info at beginning/end of context
- Implement compaction at 70-80% utilization
- Use sub-agents for context isolation, not role-play
- Design tools with 4-question framework (what, when, inputs, returns)
- Optimize for tokens-per-task, not tokens-per-request
- Validate with probe-based evaluation
- Monitor KV-cache hit rates in production
- Start minimal, add complexity only when proven necessary
Scripts
- [context_analyzer.py](./scripts/context_analyzer.py) - Context health analysis, degradation detection
- [compression_evaluator.py](./scripts/compression_evaluator.py) - Compression quality evaluation