‹ 首页

python-patterns

@vodailocz · 收录于 今天 · 上游提交 1 周前

Python development principles and decision-making. Framework selection, async patterns, type hints, project structure. Teaches thinking, not copying.

适合你,如果想系统提升 Python 工程能力而非只复制代码

/ 通过 npx 安装 校验哈希
npx oh-my-skill add vodailocz/kilo-kit-mcp/python-patterns
/ 通过 bash 安装
curl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- vodailocz/kilo-kit-mcp/python-patterns
/ 已经装过?验证本机副本,不用重装
npx oh-my-skill verify vodailocz/kilo-kit-mcp/python-patterns
安装目标可用 --agent / --scope 或 --to 明确指定;省略时只会在唯一已存在的 agent 目录上自动选择,零命中或多命中会停止并提示。content_hash 缺失或不一致均拒装。
26GitHub stars
~1.8K上下文体积 · 单文件
索引托管

怎么用

技能原文 SKILL.md作者撰写 · Apache-2.0 · c5e4d76

Python Patterns

Python development principles and decision-making for 2025. Learn to THINK, not memorize patterns.

⚠️ How to Use This Skill

This skill teaches decision-making principles, not fixed code to copy.

  • ASK user for framework preference when unclear
  • Choose async vs sync based on CONTEXT
  • Don't default to same framework every time

1. Framework Selection (2025)
Decision Tree
What are you building?
│
├── API-first / Microservices
│   └── FastAPI (async, modern, fast)
│
├── Full-stack web / CMS / Admin
│   └── Django (batteries-included)
│
├── Simple / Script / Learning
│   └── Flask (minimal, flexible)
│
├── AI/ML API serving
│   └── FastAPI (Pydantic, async, uvicorn)
│
└── Background workers
    └── Celery + any framework
Comparison Principles

| Factor | FastAPI | Django | Flask | |--------|---------|--------|-------| | Best for | APIs, microservices | Full-stack, CMS | Simple, learning | | Async | Native | Django 5.0+ | Via extensions | | Admin | Manual | Built-in | Via extensions | | ORM | Choose your own | Django ORM | Choose your own | | Learning curve | Low | Medium | Low |

Selection Questions to Ask:
  1. Is this API-only or full-stack?
  2. Need admin interface?
  3. Team familiar with async?
  4. Existing infrastructure?

2. Async vs Sync Decision
When to Use Async
async def is better when:
├── I/O-bound operations (database, HTTP, file)
├── Many concurrent connections
├── Real-time features
├── Microservices communication
└── FastAPI/Starlette/Django ASGI

def (sync) is better when:
├── CPU-bound operations
├── Simple scripts
├── Legacy codebase
├── Team unfamiliar with async
└── Blocking libraries (no async version)
The Golden Rule
I/O-bound → async (waiting for external)
CPU-bound → sync + multiprocessing (computing)

Don't:
├── Mix sync and async carelessly
├── Use sync libraries in async code
└── Force async for CPU work
Async Library Selection

| Need | Async Library | |------|---------------| | HTTP client | httpx | | PostgreSQL | asyncpg | | Redis | aioredis / redis-py async | | File I/O | aiofiles | | Database ORM | SQLAlchemy 2.0 async, Tortoise |


3. Type Hints Strategy
When to Type
Always type:
├── Function parameters
├── Return types
├── Class attributes
├── Public APIs

Can skip:
├── Local variables (let inference work)
├── One-off scripts
├── Tests (usually)
Common Type Patterns
# These are patterns, understand them:

# Optional → might be None
from typing import Optional
def find_user(id: int) -> Optional[User]: ...

# Union → one of multiple types
def process(data: str | dict) -> None: ...

# Generic collections
def get_items() -> list[Item]: ...
def get_mapping() -> dict[str, int]: ...

# Callable
from typing import Callable
def apply(fn: Callable[[int], str]) -> str: ...
Pydantic for Validation
When to use Pydantic:
├── API request/response models
├── Configuration/settings
├── Data validation
├── Serialization

Benefits:
├── Runtime validation
├── Auto-generated JSON schema
├── Works with FastAPI natively
└── Clear error messages

4. Project Structure Principles
Structure Selection
Small project / Script:
├── main.py
├── utils.py
└── requirements.txt

Medium API:
├── app/
│   ├── __init__.py
│   ├── main.py
│   ├── models/
│   ├── routes/
│   ├── services/
│   └── schemas/
├── tests/
└── pyproject.toml

Large application:
├── src/
│   └── myapp/
│       ├── core/
│       ├── api/
│       ├── services/
│       ├── models/
│       └── ...
├── tests/
└── pyproject.toml
FastAPI Structure Principles
Organize by feature or layer:

By layer:
├── routes/ (API endpoints)
├── services/ (business logic)
├── models/ (database models)
├── schemas/ (Pydantic models)
└── dependencies/ (shared deps)

By feature:
├── users/
│   ├── routes.py
│   ├── service.py
│   └── schemas.py
└── products/
    └── ...

5. Django Principles (2025)
Django Async (Django 5.0+)
Django supports async:
├── Async views
├── Async middleware
├── Async ORM (limited)
└── ASGI deployment

When to use async in Django:
├── External API calls
├── WebSocket (Channels)
├── High-concurrency views
└── Background task triggering
Django Best Practices
Model design:
├── Fat models, thin views
├── Use managers for common queries
├── Abstract base classes for shared fields

Views:
├── Class-based for complex CRUD
├── Function-based for simple endpoints
├── Use viewsets with DRF

Queries:
├── select_related() for FKs
├── prefetch_related() for M2M
├── Avoid N+1 queries
└── Use .only() for specific fields

6. FastAPI Principles
async def vs def in FastAPI
Use async def when:
├── Using async database drivers
├── Making async HTTP calls
├── I/O-bound operations
└── Want to handle concurrency

Use def when:
├── Blocking operations
├── Sync database drivers
├── CPU-bound work
└── FastAPI runs in threadpool automatically
Dependency Injection
Use dependencies for:
├── Database sessions
├── Current user / Auth
├── Configuration
├── Shared resources

Benefits:
├── Testability (mock dependencies)
├── Clean separation
├── Automatic cleanup (yield)
Pydantic v2 Integration
# FastAPI + Pydantic are tightly integrated:

# Request validation
@app.post("/users")
async def create(user: UserCreate) -> UserResponse:
    # user is already validated
    ...

# Response serialization
# Return type becomes response schema

7. Background Tasks
Selection Guide

| Solution | Best For | |----------|----------| | BackgroundTasks | Simple, in-process tasks | | Celery | Distributed, complex workflows | | ARQ | Async, Redis-based | | RQ | Simple Redis queue | | Dramatiq | Actor-based, simpler than Celery |

When to Use Each
FastAPI BackgroundTasks:
├── Quick operations
├── No persistence needed
├── Fire-and-forget
└── Same process

Celery/ARQ:
├── Long-running tasks
├── Need retry logic
├── Distributed workers
├── Persistent queue
└── Complex workflows

8. Error Handling Principles
Exception Strategy
In FastAPI:
├── Create custom exception classes
├── Register exception handlers
├── Return consistent error format
└── Log without exposing internals

Pattern:
├── Raise domain exceptions in services
├── Catch and transform in handlers
└── Client gets clean error response
Error Response Philosophy
Include:
├── Error code (programmatic)
├── Message (human readable)
├── Details (field-level when applicable)
└── NOT stack traces (security)

9. Testing Principles
Testing Strategy

| Type | Purpose | Tools | |------|---------|-------| | Unit | Business logic | pytest | | Integration | API endpoints | pytest + httpx/TestClient | | E2E | Full workflows | pytest + DB |

Async Testing
# Use pytest-asyncio for async tests

import pytest
from httpx import AsyncClient

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_endpoint():
    async with AsyncClient(app=app, base_url="http://test") as client:
        response = await client.get("/users")
        assert response.status_code == 200
Fixtures Strategy
Common fixtures:
├── db_session → Database connection
├── client → Test client
├── authenticated_user → User with token
└── sample_data → Test data setup

10. Decision Checklist

Before implementing:

  • [ ] Asked user about framework preference?
  • [ ] Chosen framework for THIS context? (not just default)
  • [ ] Decided async vs sync?
  • [ ] Planned type hint strategy?
  • [ ] Defined project structure?
  • [ ] Planned error handling?
  • [ ] Considered background tasks?

11. Anti-Patterns to Avoid
❌ DON'T:
  • Default to Django for simple APIs (FastAPI may be better)
  • Use sync libraries in async code
  • Skip type hints for public APIs
  • Put business logic in routes/views
  • Ignore N+1 queries
  • Mix async and sync carelessly
✅ DO:
  • Choose framework based on context
  • Ask about async requirements
  • Use Pydantic for validation
  • Separate concerns (routes → services → repos)
  • Test critical paths

Remember: Python patterns are about decision-making for YOUR specific context. Don't copy code—think about what serves your application best.
按 Apache-2.0 许可原样转载,未经改动 · 在 GitHub 查看 →

评论

登录即可评论;带「已验证安装」的,是发布者名下有本店的安装或持有记录。