‹ 首页

dependency-mapping

@wellapp-ai · 收录于 5 天前 · 上游提交 1 个月前

Map slice dependencies using DSM matrix and prioritize by risk

适合你,如果正在梳理复杂系统的模块依赖并想降低耦合风险

/ 通过 npx 安装 校验哈希
npx oh-my-skill add wellapp-ai/well/dependency-mapping
/ 通过 bash 安装
curl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- wellapp-ai/well/dependency-mapping
/ 已经装过?验证本机副本,不用重装
npx oh-my-skill verify wellapp-ai/well/dependency-mapping
安装目标可用 --agent / --scope 或 --to 明确指定;省略时只会在唯一已存在的 agent 目录上自动选择,零命中或多命中会停止并提示。content_hash 缺失或不一致均拒装。
340GitHub stars
~909上下文体积 · 单文件
索引托管

怎么用

商店整理自技能原文 · 版本 782601c · 表述以原文为准
它做什么

装上后,Claude 会帮你分析各功能切片之间的依赖关系,生成依赖矩阵、计算风险得分,并推荐安全的开发顺序。

什么时候触发

当你说“使用 dependency-mapping 技能”,或者在 Ask 模式的 Phase 2(CONVERGE)阶段、规划多个切片时触发。

装好后可以这样说
Claude 会构建 DSM 矩阵并给出评分。
Claude 会依据依赖数、复用程度等计算。
Claude 会标记高扇入的阻塞切片。
技能原文 SKILL.md作者撰写 · MIT · 782601c

Dependency Mapping Skill

Map dependencies between implementation slices using Design Structure Matrix (DSM), calculate risk scores, and recommend implementation sequence.

When to Use
  • During Ask mode Phase 2 (CONVERGE)
  • When planning multi-slice features
  • Before phasing to understand risk order
Instructions
Phase 1: Build DSM Matrix

Create a square matrix with slices on both axes. Mark dependencies with *:

         | #1.1 | #1.2 | #2.1 | #2.2 | #2.3 | #3.1 |
---------+------+------+------+------+------+------+
#1.1     |  -   |      |      |      |      |      |
#1.2     |  *   |  -   |      |      |      |      |
#2.1     |      |  *   |  -   |      |      |      |
#2.2     |      |      |  *   |  -   |      |  *   |
#2.3     |      |  *   |  *   |      |  -   |      |
#3.1     |      |      |      |      |      |  -   |

Legend: * = row depends on column
Reading: Row #2.2 has * in columns #2.1 and #3.1 = #2.2 depends on #2.1 AND #3.1
Phase 2: Calculate Dependency Score

For each slice, count:

| Metric | Formula | Meaning | |--------|---------|---------| | Fan-in | How many slices depend ON this? | High = blocker, ship early | | Fan-out | How many slices does this DEPEND on? | High = risky, ship later | | Dependency Score | Fan-out count | Lower = safer |

Phase 3: Calculate Leverage Score

Score each slice on reuse of existing patterns:

| Level | Score | Description | |-------|-------|-------------| | Full Reuse | 0 | Uses existing component from design system/Storybook as-is | | Extend | 1 | Extends existing component with new props/variants | | Compose | 2 | Composes multiple existing components | | New Pattern | 3 | Creates new component following design system tokens | | New System | 5 | Requires new patterns not in design system |

Check these sources before scoring:

  • /docs/design-system/components.md - Existing components
  • Glob **/*.stories.tsx - Storybook patterns
  • SemanticSearch for similar implementations in codebase
Phase 4: Calculate Risk Score
Risk Score = (Dependencies x 2) + Leverage + PriorityTier

Where PriorityTier:
- P1 (Frontend-only) = 0
- P2 (Frontend + Backend non-breaking) = 1
- P3 (Backend contract changes) = 2
- P4 (Data model changes) = 3
Phase 5: Identify Blockers

Flag slices that block others (high fan-in):

#3.1 WorkspaceInvite Entity
  Fan-in: 3 (blocks #2.2, #2.3, #2.4)
  RECOMMENDATION: Consider stub/mock for Phase 1, or ship early despite risk
Phase 6: Rank by Risk

Sort slices by Risk Score (lowest first = ships first):

| Rank | Slice | Deps | Leverage | Tier | Risk Score | |------|-------|------|----------|------|------------| | 1 | #1.1 Workspace Switcher | 0 | Extend (1) | P1 (0) | 1 | | 2 | #1.2 Members Page UI | 1 | Compose (2) | P1 (0) | 4 | | 3 | #2.1 List Members API | 1 | N/A | P2 (1) | 4 |

Output Format
## Dependency Analysis

### DSM Matrix

[Matrix as shown above]

### Risk Scoring

| Slice | Deps | Leverage | Tier | Risk | Rank |
|-------|------|----------|------|------|------|
| [Slice] | [N] | [Level (score)] | P[N] | [Score] | [#] |

### Blockers Identified

| Slice | Blocks | Fan-in | Recommendation |
|-------|--------|--------|----------------|
| [Slice] | [List] | [N] | [Stub/Ship early/etc] |

### Recommended Sequence

1. [Lowest risk slice] - [Why safe]
2. [Next slice] - [Dependencies satisfied by #1]
...

### Existing System Leverage

| Component | Source | Slices Using | LOC Saved |
|-----------|--------|--------------|-----------|
| [Component] | [design-system/Storybook] | [List] | ~[N] |
Invocation

Invoke manually with "use dependency-mapping skill" or follow Ask mode Phase 2 (CONVERGE) which references this skill.

Related Skills
  • phasing - Uses risk scores to group into phases
  • design-context - Identifies existing patterns to leverage
  • gtm-alignment - May override risk-based order for GTM priority
按 MIT 许可原样转载,未经改动 · 在 GitHub 查看 →

评论

登录即可评论;带「已验证安装」的,是发布者名下有本店的安装或持有记录。