adversarial-debate-protocol
Structured debate protocol that constructs an advocate, deploys critic attacks, and renders a judge verdict through iterative rounds.
适合你，如果需要多角度分析议题并形成结构化结论
npx oh-my-skill add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/adversarial-debate-protocolcurl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/adversarial-debate-protocolnpx oh-my-skill verify yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/adversarial-debate-protocol怎么用
商店整理自技能原文 · 版本 59ace64 · 表述以原文为准装上后，Claude 会化身辩论主持人，依次扮演辩护者、批评者和法官。先为给定观点构建最强论据，再发起多角度攻击并标注严重等级，最后做出接受/拒绝/修订的裁决。如果裁决为“修订”，Claude 会重新辩护、再攻击、再评判。
当你要求对某个观点或决策进行辩论式分析时触发。典型场景是提出一个需要批判性检验的主张。
技能原文 SKILL.md
Adversarial Debate Protocol
A formal three-role debate structure ensuring decisions survive rigorous adversarial challenge. The protocol assigns distinct roles (advocate, critic, judge) to prevent confirmation bias and ensure intellectual honesty.
Stages
- Advocate Construction — Build the strongest possible case for the position under debate
- Critic Attack — Attack the advocate's case from multiple angles with severity ratings
- Judge Verdict — Impartial assessment of advocate case vs critic attacks, rendering ACCEPT/REJECT/REVISE
- Iteration (if REVISE) — Advocate revises case, critic re-attacks, judge re-evaluates
Available SOPs
| SOP | Role | Purpose | |-----|------|---------| | advocate-construction | Advocate | Build strongest case for position | | critic-attack | Critic | Attack the case with rated arguments | | judge-verdict | Judge | Render impartial verdict |
Execution Guidance
- Minimum 2 rounds before accepting ACCEPT verdict
- Critic must produce >= 3 distinct attack arguments per round
- Judge must address every critic argument explicitly
- If judge verdict is REVISE, advocate must address specific weaknesses identified
- Maximum 4 rounds before escalating to strategy level
Minimum Yield
- Advocate case with explicit evidence and reasoning
- Critic attacks with severity ratings (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
- Judge verdict (ACCEPT/REJECT/REVISE) with point-by-point reasoning
- Conditions for acceptance (if ACCEPT)
- Required modifications (if REVISE)
<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | advocate-construction | Construct the strongest possible case for a rejected candidate or counter-position. | | critic-attack | Attack an advocate's case with multiple arguments rated by severity. | | judge-verdict | Render an impartial verdict on advocate case vs critic attacks with explicit reasoning. |
<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->