adversarial-escalation
Strategy: Progressive pressure escalation — starts with surface-level challenges and escalates to fundamental assumption attacks based on defender confidence decay.
适合你，如果需要在安全评估中模拟真实攻击者的逐步升级策略
npx oh-my-skill add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/adversarial-escalationcurl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/adversarial-escalationnpx oh-my-skill verify yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/adversarial-escalation怎么用
商店整理自技能原文 · 版本 59ace64 · 表述以原文为准Claude会作为辩论架构师，设计从表面到根本的三层攻击阶梯，并依次用批评者角色挑战你的观点。每一轮攻击后评估你的防御韧性，只有通过才会升级到更深的攻击层次，最终生成辩论总结和裁决。
当你要求测试某个观点、进行压力辩论，或需要分析论证的薄弱环节时触发。也可在对话中自然启动，如果你提出的主张被Claude认为值得挑战。
技能原文 SKILL.md
Adversarial Escalation Strategy
Progressive pressure: escalate attack sophistication based on defender performance.
Method
- debate-architect designs escalation ladder (surface → structural → foundational)
- Level 1: debate-critic probes surface claims and evidence quality
- confidence-calibration measures defender resilience
- Level 2: debate-critic attacks structural coherence and logical dependencies
- Level 3: debate-critic challenges foundational assumptions and paradigm fit
- Each level only reached if defender survives previous level
Budget Table
| Parameter | S | M | L | |---|---|---|---| | Debate rounds | 4 | 8 | 12 | | Participating agents | 3 | 5 | 8 | | Coverage dimensions | 3 | 5 | 7 | | External evidence searches | 2 | 5 | 10 |
Orchestration
debate-architect → [design escalation ladder]
→ [for each level]:
debate-critic (level-appropriate attack)
→ debate-defender → debate-judge
→ confidence-calibration
→ (escalate if survived, terminate if collapsed)
→ debate-transcript-analysis → verdict-synthesis
Subagents
- debate-architect (escalation design)
- debate-critic (multi-level attacks)
- debate-defender (responses)
- debate-judge (level adjudication)
- confidence-calibration (escalation trigger)
<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->
Available Tactics
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use | | --- | --- | | stress-test-dialectical-escalation | Tactic: Progressive debate escalation based on confidence thresholds. Each round increases attack sophistication until defender collapses or proves resilient. |
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | confidence-calibration | Calibrates confidence scores based on debate progression. Determines whether to escalate, continue, or terminate based on cumulative evidence. | | debate-architect | Designs debate structure based on artifact type — selects attack vectors, assigns perspectives, determines escalation ladder, and configures round parameters. | | debate-critic | Generates structured criticism from attack stance using Toulmin model. Produces claims, grounds, warrants, and rebuttals targeting artifact weaknesses. | | debate-defender | Responds to attacks with counter-evidence and counter-arguments. Defends artifact using evidence, clarification, and rebuttal while acknowledging valid criticisms. | | debate-judge | Evaluates debate exchanges, adjudicates argument quality, and produces round verdicts with confidence scores and reasoning. |
<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->