‹ 首页

ahrq-picme-assessment

@yogsoth-ai · 收录于 5 天前 · 上游提交 2 周前

SOP: Use the AHRQ PiCMe framework to systematically assess a research gap across 6 dimensions

适合你,如果你需要结构化评估研究空白并确定优先级

/ 通过 npx 安装 校验哈希
npx oh-my-skill add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/ahrq-picme-assessment
/ 通过 bash 安装
curl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/ahrq-picme-assessment
/ 已经装过?验证本机副本,不用重装
npx oh-my-skill verify yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/ahrq-picme-assessment
安装目标可用 --agent / --scope 或 --to 明确指定;省略时只会在唯一已存在的 agent 目录上自动选择,零命中或多命中会停止并提示。content_hash 缺失或不一致均拒装。
388GitHub stars
~520最小装载
~520含声明引用
~1.3K文本包总量
索引托管

怎么用

商店整理自技能原文 · 版本 59ace64 · 表述以原文为准
它做什么

装好后,当你提供一份完整的「研究差距记录」(GapRecord),Claude 会按照 AHRQ 的 PiCMe 框架,对 6 个维度分别打分(1-5 分)并给出文字说明,最后算出平均分,给出总体判断(强/中等/弱),还能帮你草拟一条研究问题。

什么时候触发

当你输入一个状态为“complete”的 GapRecord 对象,并且要求用 PiCMe 框架做评估时触发。

装好后可以这样说
你需要先准备好一个完整的 GapRecord。
但注意,技能会一次性完成所有维度,不会单独处理。
技能原文 SKILL.md作者撰写 · Apache-2.0 · 59ace64

AHRQ PiCMe Assessment

Use the AHRQ PiCMe framework to systematically assess a research gap across 6 dimensions.

HARD-GATE

<HARD-GATE>

  • Input must be a GapRecord with status: "complete"
  • All 6 dimensions (P/I/C/M/E + overall verdict) must be completed; none may be skipped
  • Each dimension must have an independent score (1-5) and a textual rationale
  • overall_verdict must be one of "strong" | "moderate" | "weak"

</HARD-GATE>

Pipeline
  1. Precondition check: verify completeness of the input GapRecord; confirm the domain field is valid
  2. Population (P): identify the target population/system/dataset the gap concerns; assess clarity of definition (1-5)
  3. Intervention (I): identify the proposed intervention/method/solution; assess operationalizability (1-5)
  4. Comparator (C): identify the comparison baseline (existing SOTA, no intervention, alternative approach); assess baseline reasonableness (1-5)
  5. Metrics (M): identify the evaluation metrics; assess their measurability and relevance (1-5)
  6. Evidence (E): assess the strength of existing evidence supporting the existence of the gap (1-5)
  7. Overall verdict: judge overall quality from the mean of the 5 dimensions (strong ≥ 3.5 / moderate 2.5-3.4 / weak < 2.5); generate a research question draft
  8. Output: return the PiCMeAssessment object
Output Format
{
  "gap_id": "gap_001",
  "dimensions": {
    "population": { "score": 4, "description": "Target population description", "rationale": "..." },
    "intervention": { "score": 3, "description": "Intervention/method description", "rationale": "..." },
    "comparator": { "score": 3, "description": "Comparison baseline description", "rationale": "..." },
    "metrics": { "score": 4, "description": "Evaluation metric description", "rationale": "..." },
    "evidence": { "score": 4, "description": "Evidence strength description", "rationale": "..." }
  },
  "mean_score": 3.6,
  "overall_verdict": "strong",
  "research_question_draft": "Research question draft (1 sentence)",
  "improvement_suggestions": ["Suggestion 1", "Suggestion 2"]
}

</output>

按 Apache-2.0 许可原样转载,未经改动 · 在 GitHub 查看 →

评论

登录即可评论;带「已验证安装」的,是发布者名下有本店的安装或持有记录。