analogical-transfer
Systematic structure-mapping from source to target domain (Gentner). Identify relational correspondences and transfer higher-order constraints.
适合你，如果需要在不同领域间系统化转移知识结构
npx oh-my-skill add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/analogical-transfercurl -fsSL https://oh-my-skill.com/install.sh | bash -s -- yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/analogical-transfernpx oh-my-skill verify yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/analogical-transfer怎么用
商店整理自技能原文 · 版本 59ace64 · 表述以原文为准Claude会运用结构映射理论，系统地寻找源领域与目标领域的深层关系相似性，将抽象原理迁移并适配到新领域，优先关系相似性而非表面相似性。
当你要求进行类比推理、跨领域知识迁移或举一反三时。
技能原文 SKILL.md
Analogical Transfer
Systematic structure-mapping from source to target domain following Gentner's structure-mapping theory. Prioritize relational similarity over surface similarity.
State Ledger
| Resource | Target | Current | % | |----------|--------|---------|---| | web-search | 25 | 0 | 0% | | web-research | 10 | 0 | 0% | | paper-overview | 30 | 0 | 0% | | paper-search | 20 | 0 | 0% | | paper-research | 8 | 0 | 0% |
HARD-GATE
Cannot exit strategy until ≥80% of each budget line is consumed OR yield targets are met with justification for remaining budget.
Available Tactics
| Tactic | Role | |--------|------| | analogy-extraction | Core tactic — extract and validate structural analogies | | domain-divergence | Find distant source domains with high structural similarity | | bridge-validation | Validate mapping depth before transfer |
Available SOPs
| SOP | Role | |-----|------| | domain-scanning | Find candidate source domains | | abstraction-extraction | Extract abstract relational structure | | structural-mapping | Map source→target correspondences | | analogy-quality-assessment | Rate analogy depth (surface/structural/systemic) | | transfer-adaptation | Adapt transferred principle to target constraints | | cross-domain-synthesis | Synthesize transfer outputs |
Execution Guidance
- Functionalize target: Restate target problem in relational terms (not object terms)
- Source search: Use domain-scanning to find domains with similar relational structure
- Abstract source: Extract relational structure from source using abstraction-extraction
- Map structure: Use structural-mapping to align source→target correspondences
- Assess depth: Apply analogy-quality-assessment — only proceed with STRUCTURAL or SYSTEMIC matches
- Transfer: Carry over higher-order relational constraints from source to target
- Adapt: Use transfer-adaptation to fit transferred principles to target constraints
- Validate: Confirm transferred solution respects target domain physics/logic
<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->
Available Tactics
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use | | --- | --- | | bridge-validation | Validate analogy depth and transfer viability. Ensures only deep structural analogies (not surface-level similarities) proceed to transfer. | | domain-divergence | Scan and select maximally diverse source domains. Ensures creative search covers genuinely unrelated fields with high transfer potential. |
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | abstraction-extraction | Extract abstract principles from concrete domain cases. Strips domain-specific details to reveal transferable mechanisms. | | analogy-quality-assessment | Assess analogy depth (surface/structural/systemic). Determines whether an analogy warrants transfer investment. | | cross-domain-synthesis | Synthesize all cross-domain findings into a structured idea report. Integrates outputs from all strategies and SOPs. | | structural-mapping | Map source→target structural correspondences. Identifies corresponding, missing, and extra elements between domains. | | transfer-adaptation | Adapt transferred principle to target problem constraints. Produces concrete adapted solutions from abstract principles. |
<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->